BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

559 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29998392)

  • 1. Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy.
    Han HJ; Kang CM
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 29998392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.
    Kim SH; Kang CM; Lee WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4258-4259. PubMed ID: 28342127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Reduced-Port Distal Pancreatectomy: a Multicenter Experience of a Novel Technique.
    Park G; Choi SH; Lee JH; Lim JH; Lee H; Lee JH; Kang CM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Sep; 24(9):2015-2020. PubMed ID: 31388883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.
    Chen S; Zhan Q; Chen JZ; Jin JB; Deng XX; Chen H; Shen BY; Peng CH; Li HW
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3507-18. PubMed ID: 25791063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
    Goh BK; Chan CY; Soh HL; Lee SY; Cheow PC; Chow PK; Ooi LL; Chung AY
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Mar; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 26813478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Comparison of Robotic Single-Site Surgery to Single-Port Laparoendoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Advanced-Stage Endometriosis.
    Moon HS; Shim JE; Lee SR; Jeong K
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1483-1488. PubMed ID: 29932792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study.
    Weng Y; Jin J; Huo Z; Shi Y; Jiang Y; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
    Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2255-2264. PubMed ID: 32458287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Souche R; Herrero A; Bourel G; Chauvat J; Pirlet I; Guillon F; Nocca D; Borie F; Mercier G; Fabre JM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3562-3569. PubMed ID: 29396754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Timmerhuis HC; Jensen CW; Ngongoni RF; Baiocchi M; DeLong JC; Ohkuma R; Dua MM; Norton JA; Poultsides GA; Worth PJ; Visser BC
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):2095-2105. PubMed ID: 38438677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
    Hu YH; Qin YF; Yu DD; Li X; Zhao YM; Kong DJ; Jin W; Wang H
    J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Feb; 9(3):201-218. PubMed ID: 31975614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score-matched study.
    Liu R; Liu Q; Zhao ZM; Tan XL; Gao YX; Zhao GD
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):461-469. PubMed ID: 28628713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy: a robotic or LESS approach.
    Ryan CE; Ross SB; Sukharamwala PB; Sadowitz BD; Wood TW; Rosemurgy AS
    JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00246. PubMed ID: 25848192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal resection and enucleation for potentially benign pancreatic neoplasms.
    Najafi N; Mintziras I; Wiese D; Albers MB; Maurer E; Bartsch DK
    Surg Today; 2020 Aug; 50(8):872-880. PubMed ID: 32016613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for PNETs: laparoscopic or robotic approach?
    Zhang J; Jin J; Chen S; Gu J; Zhu Y; Qin K; Zhan Q; Cheng D; Chen H; Deng X; Shen B; Peng C
    Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(20):33872-33883. PubMed ID: 28477012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study].
    Lin XC; Huang HG; Chen YC; Lu FC; Lin RG; Yang YY; Wang CF; Fang HZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 57(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 30704212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-Assisted Approach Improves Vessel Preservation in Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy.
    Eckhardt S; Schicker C; Maurer E; Fendrich V; Bartsch DK
    Dig Surg; 2016; 33(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 27160088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic tumors: a single surgeon's experience of 228 consecutive cases.
    Hong S; Song KB; Madkhali AA; Hwang K; Yoo D; Lee JW; Youn WY; Alshammary S; Park Y; Lee W; Kwon J; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2465-2473. PubMed ID: 31463719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Review of the English Literature.
    Wang K; Fan Y
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):134-140. PubMed ID: 27828724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's robotic experience in a high-volume center.
    Zhang X; Chen W; Jiang J; Ye Y; Hu W; Zhai Z; Bai X; Liang T
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9186-9193. PubMed ID: 35851817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First experience with robotic spleen-saving, vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy in Singapore: a report of three consecutive cases.
    Goh BK; Wong JS; Chan CY; Cheow PC; Ooi LL; Chung AY
    Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):464-9. PubMed ID: 26805665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.