BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29998885)

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Consistency of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Study on Six Prostate Radiologists with Different Experiences from Half a Year to 17 Years.
    Ke Z; Wang L; Min XD; Feng ZY; Kang Z; Zhang PP; Li BS; You HJ; Hou SC
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Jul; 131(14):1666-1673. PubMed ID: 29998885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
    Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
    Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1.
    Brembilla G; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Damascelli A; Brunetti L; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Schiani E; Venturini E; Grippaldi D; Mendola V; Rancoita PMV; Esposito A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3383-3392. PubMed ID: 32052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang D; Zhang X; Bai X; Yan W; Zhou Y; Zhou Z; Xiao Y; Jin Z; Sun H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4133-4141. PubMed ID: 32918577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The diagnostic value of version 2.1 prostate imaging reporting and data system for prostate transitional zone lesions].
    Yang S; Zhang CY; Zhang YY; Tan SX; Wei CG; Shen XH; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 100(45):3609-3613. PubMed ID: 33333685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
    Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bridging the experience gap in prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using artificial intelligence: A prospective multi-reader comparison study on inter-reader agreement in PI-RADS v2.1, image quality and reporting time between novice and expert readers.
    Forookhi A; Laschena L; Pecoraro M; Borrelli A; Massaro M; Dehghanpour A; Cipollari S; Catalano C; Panebianco V
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 161():110749. PubMed ID: 36812699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
    Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is possible to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADS v2 for the assessment of prostate MRI?
    Viana PCC; Horvat N; do Santos VR; Lima TC; Romão DDS; Cerri LMO; de Castro MG; Vargas HA; Miranda JA; Leite CDC; Cerri GG
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):724-731. PubMed ID: 31136114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy in Interpreting mpMRI of the Prostate: a Systematic Review.
    Annamalai A; Fustok JN; Beltran-Perez J; Rashad AT; Krane LS; Triche BL
    Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 35226257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
    Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Becker AS; Cornelius A; Reiner CS; Stocker D; Ulbrich EJ; Barth BK; Mortezavi A; Eberli D; Donati OF
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():58-63. PubMed ID: 28941761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.