These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29999041)

  • 1. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 4: resin composite restorations: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.
    Burke FJT; Lucarotti PSK
    Br Dent J; 2018 Jun; 224(12):945-956. PubMed ID: 29999041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 2: Amalgam restorations - time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.
    Burke FJT; Lucarotti PSK
    Br Dent J; 2018 May; 224(10):789-800. PubMed ID: 29795518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 8: Canine teeth: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.
    Lucarotti PSK; Burke FJT
    Br Dent J; 2018 Oct; 225(8):731-741. PubMed ID: 30361591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 10: key findings from a ten million restoration dataset.
    Burke FJT; Lucarotti PSK
    Br Dent J; 2018 Dec; 225(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 30547930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 3: Glass ionomer restorations - time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.
    Burke FJT; Lucarotti PSK
    Br Dent J; 2018 Jun; 224(11):865-874. PubMed ID: 29855590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 6: molar teeth: restoration time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.
    Lucarotti PSK; Burke FJT
    Br Dent J; 2018 Sep; 225(6):525-536. PubMed ID: 30214076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Replacement and initial placement of tooth colored restorations: a review and discussion.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 78(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9800555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 9: incisor teeth: restoration time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.
    Lucarotti PSK; Burke FJT
    Br Dent J; 2018 Nov; 225(10):964-975. PubMed ID: 30468202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-quality evidence suggests that amalgam has increased longevity compared with resin-based composite in posterior restorations.
    Wong YJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):905-906. PubMed ID: 27793299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extensive composite molar restorations: 3 years clinical evaluation.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Johansson AK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jul; 70(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 21780983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
    Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
    Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.