150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29999149)
21. Evaluation of the Utility of Screening Mammography for High-Risk Women Undergoing Screening Breast MR Imaging.
Lo G; Scaranelo AM; Aboras H; Ghai S; Kulkarni S; Fleming R; Bukhanov K; Crystal P
Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 28586291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.
Sogani J; Morris EA; Kaplan JB; D'Alessio D; Goldman D; Moskowitz CS; Jochelson MS
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 27379544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantification of enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography using a custom-made quantifier tool (I-STRIP): A proof-of-concept study.
Lobbes MBI; Mulder HKP; Rousch M; Backes WH; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 30150032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.
Luczyńska E; Heinze S; Adamczyk A; Rys J; Mitus JW; Hendrick E
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4359-66. PubMed ID: 27466557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Practical uses of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in daily work: A pictorial review.
Alexander S; Dulku G; Hashoul S; Taylor DB
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):473-478. PubMed ID: 31332941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging.
Lewin J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2018 May; 26(2):259-263. PubMed ID: 29622130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Angiomammography: A review of current evidences.
Dromain C; Vietti-Violi N; Meuwly JY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):593-605. PubMed ID: 30962168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion.
Patel BK; Naylor ME; Kosiorek HE; Lopez-Alvarez YM; Miller AM; Pizzitola VJ; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():44-52. PubMed ID: 28723585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Practical application of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography [CE-MRM] by an algorithm combining morphological and enhancement patterns.
Potente G; Messineo D; Maggi C; Savelli S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19095407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
