These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30001281)
1. Assessing Cochlear Implant Performance in Older Adults Using a Single, Universal Outcome Measure Created With Imputation in HERMES. Sharma RK; Chen SY; Grisel J; Golub JS Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):987-994. PubMed ID: 30001281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsible Imputation of Missing Speech Perception Testing Data & Analysis of 4,739 Observations and Predictors of Performance. Pavelchek C; Lee DS; Walia A; Michelson AP; Ortmann A; Gentile B; Herzog JA; Buchman CA; Shew MA Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jul; 44(6):e369-e378. PubMed ID: 37231531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Older Adults Using HERMES: A National Web-based Database. Chen SY; Grisel JJ; Lam A; Golub JS Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e405-e412. PubMed ID: 28984801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception performance as a function of age at implantation among postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients. Mahmoud AF; Ruckenstein MJ Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e286-91. PubMed ID: 25226375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer. Sharma RK; Smetak MR; Patro A; Lindquist NR; Perkins EL; Holder JT; Haynes DS; Tawfik KO Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):1149-1154. PubMed ID: 36201525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients Consistent Across Different Tests? Andresen NS; Vohra V; Galaiya DJ; Carver CL; Marsiglia DD; Yeagle JD; Creighton FX; Wang NY; Bowditch SP; Della Santina CC; Sun DQ Otol Neurotol; 2022 Aug; 43(7):e720-e725. PubMed ID: 35878632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Is Associated With Durable Improvements in Cochlear Implant Quality of Life. Dornhoffer JR; Shannon C; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):905-914. PubMed ID: 38351509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery? Mudery JA; Francis R; McCrary H; Jacob A Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 27832005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation. Patro A; Lindquist NR; Holder JT; Tawfik KO; O'Malley MR; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Gifford R; Perkins EL Otol Neurotol; 2022 Oct; 43(9):1033-1040. PubMed ID: 36075098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of Cognitive Impairment Screening Scores With Improvements in Speech Recognition and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation. Raymond MJ; Ma C; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Camposeo EL; Nguyen SA; Meyer TA; McRackan TR JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Apr; 149(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 36729460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode. Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic variants in the peripheral auditory system significantly affect adult cochlear implant performance. Shearer AE; Eppsteiner RW; Frees K; Tejani V; Sloan-Heggen CM; Brown C; Abbas P; Dunn C; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Smith RJH Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():138-142. PubMed ID: 28213135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults. Dornhoffer JR; Reddy P; Ma C; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):e165-e173. PubMed ID: 34772887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Franko-Tobin E; Camilon PR; Camposeo E; Holcomb MA; Meyer TA Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 25569365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Long-term results. Gantz BJ; Dunn CC; Oleson J; Hansen MR Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 28543270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users. Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impact of Comorbidities in the Aging Population on Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Wilkerson BJ; Porps SF; Babu SC Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e285-e288. PubMed ID: 28806340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]