These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30003295)

  • 1. How do reaching and walking costs affect movement path selection?
    Potts CA; Callahan-Flintoft C; Rosenbaum DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2727-2737. PubMed ID: 30003295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-crastination: hastening subgoal completion at the expense of extra physical effort.
    Rosenbaum DA; Gong L; Potts CA
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1487-96. PubMed ID: 24815613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre-crastination and procrastination effects occur in a reach-to-grasp task.
    Blinch J; DeWinne CR
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1129-1139. PubMed ID: 30783715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Starting or finishing sooner? Sequencing preferences in object transfer tasks.
    Fournier LR; Stubblefield AM; Dyre BP; Rosenbaum DA
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1674-1684. PubMed ID: 29687233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reaching while walking: reaching distance costs more than walking distance.
    Rosenbaum DA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1100-4. PubMed ID: 19001574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How are cognitive and physical difficulty compared?
    Potts CA; Pastel S; Rosenbaum DA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):500-511. PubMed ID: 29116613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precrastination and the cognitive-load-reduction (CLEAR) hypothesis.
    Patterson EE; Kahan TA
    Memory; 2020 Jan; 28(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 31726943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which task will we choose first? Precrastination and cognitive load in task ordering.
    Fournier LR; Coder E; Kogan C; Raghunath N; Taddese E; Rosenbaum DA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):489-503. PubMed ID: 30506327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The tiger on your tail: choosing between temporally extended behaviors.
    Rosenbaum DA
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 22810168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling the learning of biomechanics and visual planning for decision-making of motor actions.
    Cos I; Khamassi M; Girard B
    J Physiol Paris; 2013 Nov; 107(5):399-408. PubMed ID: 23973913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. End-state comfort meets pre-crastination.
    Rosenbaum DA; Sauerberger KS
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 30623239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral ecology meets motor behavior: choosing between walking and reaching paths.
    Rosenbaum DA; Brach M; Semenov A
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 21347951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constraints on arm selection processes when reaching: degrees of freedom and joint amplitudes interact to influence limb selection.
    Kim W; Buchanan J; Gabbard C
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(5):403-11. PubMed ID: 21978264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal weighting of costs and probabilities in a risky motor decision-making task requires experience.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 23163791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-sensitivity and the mean-variance trade-off: decision making in sensorimotor control.
    Nagengast AJ; Braun DA; Wolpert DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Aug; 278(1716):2325-32. PubMed ID: 21208966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual decision processes flexibly adapt to avoid change-of-mind motor costs.
    Moher J; Song JH
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):1. PubMed ID: 24986186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making in slow and rapid reaching: Sacrificing success to minimize effort.
    Hesse C; Kangur K; Hunt AR
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104426. PubMed ID: 32800570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating decision strategies in free-choice tasks - A mouse tracking analysis.
    Vogel D; Scherbaum S; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():65-71. PubMed ID: 30015137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaching for the unknown: multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task.
    Chapman CS; Gallivan JP; Wood DK; Milne JL; Culham JC; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2010 Aug; 116(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 20471007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.