These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30003569)

  • 1. A pooling strategy to effectively use genotype data in quantitative traits genome-wide association studies.
    Zhang W; Liu A; Albert PS; Ashmead RD; Schisterman EF; Mills JL
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):4083-4095. PubMed ID: 30003569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditional analysis of multiple quantitative traits based on marginal GWAS summary statistics.
    Deng Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 28464407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for testing association between uncertain genotypes and quantitative traits.
    Kutalik Z; Johnson T; Bochud M; Mooser V; Vollenweider P; Waeber G; Waterworth D; Beckmann JS; Bergmann S
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 20543033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel association test for multiple secondary phenotypes from a case-control GWAS.
    Ray D; Basu S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):413-426. PubMed ID: 28393390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance Gains in Genome-Wide Association Studies for Longitudinal Traits via Modeling Time-varied effects.
    Ning C; Kang H; Zhou L; Wang D; Wang H; Wang A; Fu J; Zhang S; Liu J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7(1):590. PubMed ID: 28377602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing Genetic Pleiotropy with GWAS Summary Statistics for Marginal and Conditional Analyses.
    Deng Y; Pan W
    Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1285-1299. PubMed ID: 28971959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semiparametric Allelic Tests for Mapping Multiple Phenotypes: Binomial Regression and Mahalanobis Distance.
    Majumdar A; Witte JS; Ghosh S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 26493781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FSHB -211 G>T is a major genetic modulator of reproductive physiology and health in childbearing age women.
    Rull K; Grigorova M; Ehrenberg A; Vaas P; Sekavin A; Nõmmemees D; Adler M; Hanson E; Juhanson P; Laan M
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):954-966. PubMed ID: 29617818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concepts, estimation and interpretation of SNP-based heritability.
    Yang J; Zeng J; Goddard ME; Wray NR; Visscher PM
    Nat Genet; 2017 Aug; 49(9):1304-1310. PubMed ID: 28854176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and power of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) diversity panel newly designed for association studies.
    Nicolas SD; Péros JP; Lacombe T; Launay A; Le Paslier MC; Bérard A; Mangin B; Valière S; Martins F; Le Cunff L; Laucou V; Bacilieri R; Dereeper A; Chatelet P; This P; Doligez A
    BMC Plant Biol; 2016 Mar; 16():74. PubMed ID: 27005772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimates of array and pool-construction variance for planning efficient DNA-pooling genome wide association studies.
    Earp MA; Rahmani M; Chew K; Brooks-Wilson A
    BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Nov; 4():81. PubMed ID: 22122996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of multi-trait associations using pathway-based analysis of GWAS summary statistics.
    Pei G; Sun H; Dai Y; Liu X; Zhao Z; Jia P
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Feb; 20(Suppl 1):79. PubMed ID: 30712509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of gene-based rare variant association mapping methods for quantitative traits in a bovine population with complex familial relationships.
    Zhang Q; Guldbrandtsen B; Calus MP; Lund MS; Sahana G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):60. PubMed ID: 27534618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical tests of genetic association for case-control study designs.
    Wang K
    Biostatistics; 2012 Sep; 13(4):724-33. PubMed ID: 22389176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of measurement error on testing genetic association with quantitative traits.
    Liao J; Li X; Wong TY; Wang JJ; Khor CC; Tai ES; Aung T; Teo YY; Cheng CY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87044. PubMed ID: 24475218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance Testing for Allelic Heterogeneity.
    Deng Y; Pan W
    Genetics; 2018 Sep; 210(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 29959179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fast algorithm for Bayesian multi-locus model in genome-wide association studies.
    Duan W; Zhao Y; Wei Y; Yang S; Bai J; Shen S; Du M; Huang L; Hu Z; Chen F
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2017 Aug; 292(4):923-934. PubMed ID: 28534238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of non-normality and low count variants on cross-phenotype association tests in GWAS.
    Ray D; Chatterjee N
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Mar; 28(3):300-312. PubMed ID: 31582815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using extreme phenotype sampling to identify the rare causal variants of quantitative traits in association studies.
    Li D; Lewinger JP; Gauderman WJ; Murcray CE; Conti D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(8):790-9. PubMed ID: 21922541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide association study for endocrine fertility traits using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and sequence variants in dairy cattle.
    Tenghe AMM; Bouwman AC; Berglund B; Strandberg E; de Koning DJ; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5470-5485. PubMed ID: 27157577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.