These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30003936)

  • 1. Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.
    Martin AL; Franklin AN; Perlman JE; Bloomsmith MA
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():445-452. PubMed ID: 30003936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.
    Vicars SM; Miguel CF; Sobie JL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():75-83. PubMed ID: 24270051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items.
    Fritz JN; Roath CT; Shoemaker PT; Edwards AB; Hussein LA; Villante NK; Langlinais CA; Rettig LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1688-1701. PubMed ID: 32307709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training rhesus macaques for venipuncture using positive reinforcement techniques: a comparison with chimpanzees.
    Coleman K; Pranger L; Maier A; Lambeth SP; Perlman JE; Thiele E; Schapiro SJ
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 47(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 18210997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.
    Daly EJ; Wells NJ; Swanger-Gagné MS; Carr JE; Kunz GM; Taylor AM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 20190919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Food preference, keeper ratings, and reinforcer effectiveness in exotic animals: the value of systematic testing.
    Gaalema DE; Perdue BM; Kelling AS
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2011; 14(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 21191846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.
    Call NA; Trosclair-Lasserre NM; Findley AJ; Reavis AR; Shillingsburg MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):763-77. PubMed ID: 23322931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An automated system for positive reinforcement training of group-housed macaque monkeys at breeding and research facilities.
    Tulip J; Zimmermann JB; Farningham D; Jackson A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Jun; 285():6-18. PubMed ID: 28472677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive reinforcement training moderates only high levels of abnormal behavior in singly housed rhesus macaques.
    Baker KC; Bloomsmith M; Neu K; Griffis C; Maloney M; Oettinger B; Schoof VA; Martinez M
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2009; 12(3):236-52. PubMed ID: 20183477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the results of one-session, two-session, and three-session MSWO preference assessments.
    Conine DE; Morris SL; Kronfli FR; Slanzi CM; Petronelli AK; Kalick L; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):700-712. PubMed ID: 33465255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habituation and desensitization as methods for reducing fearful behavior in singly housed rhesus macaques.
    Clay AW; Bloomsmith MA; Marr MJ; Maple TL
    Am J Primatol; 2009 Jan; 71(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 18850584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice-based severity scale (CSS): assessing the relative severity of procedures from a laboratory animal's perspective.
    Cassidy L; Treue S; Gail A; Pfefferle D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17300. PubMed ID: 38903880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refining the pole-and-collar method of restraint: emphasizing the use of positive training techniques with rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
    McMillan JL; Perlman JE; Galvan A; Wichmann T; Bloomsmith MA
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2014 Jan; 53(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 24411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
    Evans TA; Beran MJ
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):199-216. PubMed ID: 17503695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manipulating the affiliative interactions of group-housed rhesus macaques using positive reinforcement training techniques.
    Schapiro SJ; Perlman JE; Boudreau BA
    Am J Primatol; 2001 Nov; 55(3):137-49. PubMed ID: 11746277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relation between reinforcer efficacy and preference.
    Lee MS; Yu CT; Martin TL; Martin GL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010 Mar; 43(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 20808498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessment tool and its predictive validity.
    Curiel H; Curiel ESL; Villanueva S; Ayala CEG; Cadigan AS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Jan; 57(1):226-235. PubMed ID: 37937467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monkeys would rather see and do: preference for agentic control in rhesus macaques.
    Jensen G; Altschul D; Terrace H
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 229(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23354662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neonatal hippocampal damage impairs specific food/place associations in adult macaques.
    Glavis-Bloom C; Alvarado MC; Bachevalier J
    Behav Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 127(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 23398438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of paired- and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement preference assessments to identify reinforcers for dog behavior.
    Payne SW; Fulgencio CT; Aniga RN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Jul; 120(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 37199306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.