204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30004320)
1. Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey.
Farmer LJ; Farrell DT
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2424-2433. PubMed ID: 30004320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer sensory evaluation and chemical composition of beef gluteus medius and triceps brachii steaks from cattle finished on forage or concentrate diets.
Chail A; Legako JF; Pitcher LR; Ward RE; Martini S; MacAdam JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 28464115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of different ageing methods on colour, yield, oxidation and sensory qualities of Australian beef loins consumed in Australia and Japan.
Ha M; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne R; Huynh L; Galletly J; Kobayashi K; Nishimura T; Bonney S; Kelman KR; Warner RD
Food Res Int; 2019 Nov; 125():108528. PubMed ID: 31554125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contributions of tenderness, juiciness and flavor liking to overall liking of beef in Europe.
Liu J; Ellies-Oury MP; Chriki S; Legrand I; Pogorzelski G; Wierzbicki J; Farmer L; Troy D; Polkinghorne R; Hocquette JF
Meat Sci; 2020 Oct; 168():108190. PubMed ID: 32450455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies to predict and improve eating quality of cooked beef using carcass and meat composition traits in Angus cattle.
Mateescu RG; Oltenacu PA; Garmyn AJ; Mafi GG; VanOverbeke DL
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2160-71. PubMed ID: 27285712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries.
Verbeke W; Van Wezemael L; de Barcellos MD; Kügler JO; Hocquette JF; Ueland Ø; Grunert KG
Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 19961887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties.
Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG
J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4943-4958. PubMed ID: 27898955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of packaging on consumer eating quality of beef.
Polkinghorne RJ; Philpott J; Perovic J; Lau J; Davies L; Mudannayake W; Watson R; Tarr G; Thompson JM
Meat Sci; 2018 Aug; 142():59-64. PubMed ID: 29660545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.
Legrand I; Hocquette JF; Polkinghorne RJ; Pethick DW
Animal; 2013 Mar; 7(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 23031268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effects of supplementing beef steers with zilpaterol hydrochloride, ractopamine hydrochloride, or no beta agonist on strip loin composition, raw and cooked color properties, shear force, and consumer assessment of steaks aged for fourteen or twenty-one days postmortem.
Garmyn AJ; Brooks JC; Hodgen JM; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Rathmann RJ; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3670-84. PubMed ID: 24879757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings.
Lucherk LW; O'Quinn TG; Legako JF; Rathmann RJ; Brooks JC; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jun; 95(6):2421-2437. PubMed ID: 28727037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eating quality prediction of beef from Italian Simmental cattle based on experts' steak assessment.
Borgogno M; Saccà E; Corazzin M; Favotto S; Bovolenta S; Piasentier E
Meat Sci; 2016 Aug; 118():1-7. PubMed ID: 26998946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of palatability and muscle composition of novel value-added beef cuts.
Yeh Y; Omaye ST; Ribeiro FA; Calkins CR; de Mello AS
Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():79-83. PubMed ID: 28942340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
