307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30006644)
1. More accurate than MRI measurement of tumor size in breast cancer by using the peri-tumoral halo uptake layer method of the
Park SH; Seo M; Choi HJ; Bae K; Bang M; Jun S
Hell J Nucl Med; 2018; 21(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 30006644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography using 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-18-fluoro-D-glucose peri-tumoral halo uptake layer method outperforms magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound methods in tumor size measurement of breast cancer.
Wu Y; Lu Y; Xu C; Lin B
Oncol Lett; 2020 Jun; 19(6):3881-3888. PubMed ID: 32391098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Sheikhbahaei S; Trahan TJ; Xiao J; Taghipour M; Mena E; Connolly RM; Subramaniam RM
Oncologist; 2016 Aug; 21(8):931-9. PubMed ID: 27401897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.
Magometschnigg HF; Baltzer PA; Fueger B; Helbich TH; Karanikas G; Dubsky P; Rudas M; Weber M; Pinker K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1656-1665. PubMed ID: 26121928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in low 18F-FDG-avidity breast cancer subtypes: comparison with breast US and MRI.
Park HL; Yoo IR; O JH; Kim H; Kim SH; Kang BJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28984814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new method for segmentation of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume using the peritumoural halo layer and a 10-step colour scale. A study in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Jun S; Kim H; Nam HY
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(6):272-85. PubMed ID: 26429587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI fused with prone FDG PET/CT improves the primary tumour staging of patients with breast cancer.
Garcia-Velloso MJ; Ribelles MJ; Rodriguez M; Fernandez-Montero A; Sancho L; Prieto E; Santisteban M; Rodriguez-Spiteri N; Idoate MA; Martinez-Regueira F; Elizalde A; Pina LJ
Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3190-3198. PubMed ID: 28004161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Hassan A; Siddique M; Bashir H; Riaz S; Wali R; Mahreen A; Nawaz MK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jul; 44(7):1198-1206. PubMed ID: 28229191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Journal Club: Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in predicting the clinicopathologic subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Sugie T; Mikami Y; Toi M; Togashi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 25055259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Byun BH; Noh WC; Lim I; Lee SS; Cho AR; Park JA; Kim KM; Kim HA; Kim EK; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 27(8):720-8. PubMed ID: 23700260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased FDG uptake in breast cancer is associated with prognostic factors.
Sanli Y; Kuyumcu S; Ozkan ZG; Işik G; Karanlik H; Guzelbey B; Turkmen C; Ozel S; Yavuz E; Mudun A
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 May; 26(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 22359222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating heterogeneity of primary tumor (18)F-FDG uptake in breast cancer with a dedicated breast PET (MAMMI): a feasibility study based on correlation with PET/CT.
Koolen BB; Vidal-Sicart S; Benlloch Baviera JM; Valdés Olmos RA
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 May; 35(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 24686195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI.
Choi EK; Yoo IR; Kim SH; Park SY; O JH; Kang BJ
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 28427271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate FDG PET tumor segmentation using the peritumoral halo layer method: a study in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Jun S; Park JG; Seo Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 30257714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating molecular subtypes and clinicopathological features of primary breast cancer.
Arslan E; Çermik TF; Trabulus FDC; Talu ECK; Başaran Ş
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):680-690. PubMed ID: 29893750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of FDG-avid loco-regional recurrent and compromised benign lesions after surgery for breast cancer with dual-time point F-18-fluorodeoxy-glucose PET/CT scan.
Suga K; Kawakami Y; Hiyama A; Matsunaga N
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jun; 23(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 19452249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
