BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30007075)

  • 1. Synthetic head and neck and phantom images for determining deformable image registration accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Cardenas CE; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Stafford RJ; Zhou S; Court LE
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30007075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
    Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
    Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head and neck cancer patient images for determining auto-segmentation accuracy in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging through expert manual segmentations.
    Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Yang J; Gooding M; Veeraraghavan H; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Ng SP; Ding Y; Wang J; Lai SY; Fuller CD; Sharp G
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2317-2322. PubMed ID: 32418343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A super-resolution framework for the reconstruction of T2-weighted (T2w) time-resolved (TR) 4DMRI using T1w TR-4DMRI as the guidance.
    Nie X; Saleh Z; Kadbi M; Zakian K; Deasy J; Rimner A; Li G
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3091-3102. PubMed ID: 32166757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
    Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.
    Saleh ZH; Apte AP; Sharp GC; Shusharina NP; Wang Y; Veeraraghavan H; Thor M; Muren LP; Rao SS; Lee NY; Deasy JO
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 24440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of deformable image registration between external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer with a 3D-printed deformable pelvis phantom.
    Kadoya N; Miyasaka Y; Nakajima Y; Kuroda Y; Ito K; Chiba M; Sato K; Dobashi S; Yamamoto T; Takahashi N; Kubozono M; Takeda K; Jingu K
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 28214368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a commercial deformable image registration for surface-guided radiotherapy using an ad hoc-developed deformable phantom.
    Pallotta S; Kugele M; Redapi L; Ceberg S
    Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6310-6318. PubMed ID: 33034065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
    Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective quantitative quality assurance and deformation estimation of MRI-CT image registration in simulation of head and neck radiotherapy patients.
    ; Kiser K; Meheissen MAM; Mohamed ASR; Kamal M; Ng SP; Elhalawani H; Jethanandani A; He R; Ding Y; Rostom Y; Hegazy N; Bahig H; Garden A; Lai S; Phan J; Gunn GB; Rosenthal D; Frank S; Brock KK; Wang J; Fuller CD
    Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 18():120-127. PubMed ID: 31341987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.
    Pukala J; Meeks SL; Staton RJ; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Langen KM
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111703. PubMed ID: 24320411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a deformable lung phantom with 3D-printed flexible airways.
    Shin DS; Kang SH; Kim KH; Kim TH; Kim DS; Chung JB; Lucero SA; Suh TS; Yamamoto T
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):898-908. PubMed ID: 31863479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
    Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiatlas approach with local registration goodness weighting for MRI-based electron density mapping of head and neck anatomy.
    Farjam R; Tyagi N; Veeraraghavan H; Apte A; Zakian K; Hunt MA; Deasy JO
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3706-3717. PubMed ID: 28444772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning anatomy changes from patient populations to create artificial CT images for voxel-level validation of deformable image registration.
    Yu ZH; Kudchadker R; Dong L; Zhang Y; Court LE; Mourtada F; Yock A; Tucker SL; Yang J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):246-258. PubMed ID: 26894362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance assessment of intra-acquisition diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging registration and contour propagation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
    Naser MA; Wahid KA; Ahmed S; Salama V; Dede C; Edwards BW; Lin R; McDonald B; Salzillo TC; He R; Ding Y; Abdelaal MA; Thill D; O'Connell N; Willcut V; Christodouleas JP; Lai SY; Fuller CD; Mohamed ASR
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2089-2099. PubMed ID: 36519973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skull phantom-based methodology to validate MRI co-registration accuracy for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
    Oglesby RT; Lam WW; Ruschin M; Holden L; Sarfehnia A; Yeboah C; Sahgal A; Soliman H; Detsky J; Tseng CL; Myrehaug S; Husain Z; Lau AZ; Stanisz GJ; Chugh BP
    Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 49(11):7071-7084. PubMed ID: 35842918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion modeling from 4D MR images of liver simulating phantom.
    Kavaluus H; Koivula L; Salli E; Seppälä T; Saarilahti K; Tenhunen M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13611. PubMed ID: 35413145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of DIR schemes on tumor/organ with progressive shrinkage: Accuracy of tumor/organ internal tissue tracking during the radiation treatment.
    Qin A; Chen S; Liang J; Snyder M; Yan D
    Radiother Oncol; 2022 Aug; 173():170-178. PubMed ID: 35667570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.