These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30007122)

  • 21. Oblique and rotation double random forest.
    Ganaie MA; Tanveer M; Suganthan PN; Snasel V
    Neural Netw; 2022 Sep; 153():496-517. PubMed ID: 35816861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feature selection via coalitional game theory.
    Cohen S; Dror G; Ruppin E
    Neural Comput; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1939-61. PubMed ID: 17521285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of pooling samples on the performance of classification algorithms: a comparative study.
    Kusonmano K; Netzer M; Baumgartner C; Dehmer M; Liedl KR; Graber A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():278352. PubMed ID: 22654582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Classification of THz pulse signals using two-dimensional cross-correlation feature extraction and non-linear classifiers.
    Siuly ; Yin X; Hadjiloucas S; Zhang Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():64-82. PubMed ID: 27000290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25.
    Raeisi Shahraki H; Pourahmad S; Zare N
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():7560807. PubMed ID: 29376076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vicinal support vector classifier using supervised kernel-based clustering.
    Yang X; Cao A; Song Q; Schaefer G; Su Y
    Artif Intell Med; 2014 Mar; 60(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 24637294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Classifiers as a model-free group comparison test.
    Kim B; Oertzen TV
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):416-426. PubMed ID: 28374145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficient information theoretic strategies for classifier combination, feature extraction and performance evaluation in improving false positives and false negatives for spam e-mail filtering.
    Zorkadis V; Karras DA; Panayotou M
    Neural Netw; 2005; 18(5-6):799-807. PubMed ID: 16111865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benchmarking protein classification algorithms via supervised cross-validation.
    Kertész-Farkas A; Dhir S; Sonego P; Pacurar M; Netoteia S; Nijveen H; Kuzniar A; Leunissen JA; Kocsor A; Pongor S
    J Biochem Biophys Methods; 2008 Apr; 70(6):1215-23. PubMed ID: 17604112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contemporary QSAR classifiers compared.
    Bruce CL; Melville JL; Pickett SD; Hirst JD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 17238267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robust Feature Selection from Microarray Data Based on Cooperative Game Theory and Qualitative Mutual Information.
    Mortazavi A; Moattar MH
    Adv Bioinformatics; 2016; 2016():1058305. PubMed ID: 27127506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving PLS-RFE based gene selection for microarray data classification.
    Wang A; An N; Chen G; Li L; Alterovitz G
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jul; 62():14-24. PubMed ID: 25912984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Locality preserving score for joint feature weights learning.
    Yan H; Yang J
    Neural Netw; 2015 Sep; 69():126-34. PubMed ID: 26113239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Tree species information extraction of farmland returned to forests based on improved support vector machine algorithm].
    Wu J; Peng DL
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2011 Apr; 31(4):1038-41. PubMed ID: 21714255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Feature selection for elderly faller classification based on wearable sensors.
    Howcroft J; Kofman J; Lemaire ED
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):47. PubMed ID: 28558724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines.
    Malley JD; Kruppa J; Dasgupta A; Malley KG; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21915433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unbiased feature selection in learning random forests for high-dimensional data.
    Nguyen TT; Huang JZ; Nguyen TT
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():471371. PubMed ID: 25879059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feature weighting algorithms for classification of hyperspectral images using a support vector machine.
    Qi B; Zhao C; Yin G
    Appl Opt; 2014 May; 53(13):2839-46. PubMed ID: 24921869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variable importance-weighted Random Forests.
    Liu Y; Zhao H
    Quant Biol; 2017 Dec; 5(4):338-351. PubMed ID: 30034909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.