These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30007543)

  • 21. Safety and efficacy of a novel disposable circumcision device: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial at 2 centers.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Xia S; Zhu Z; Jia L; Liu Y; Jiang M
    Med Sci Monit; 2014 Mar; 20():454-62. PubMed ID: 24647226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized Controlled Trial of the ShangRing for Adult Medical Male Circumcision: Safety, Effectiveness, and Acceptability of Using 7 Versus 14 Device Sizes.
    Feldblum PJ; Zulu R; Linyama D; Long S; Nonde TJ; Lai JJ; Kashitala J; Veena V; Kasonde P
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S30-5. PubMed ID: 27331587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
    Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. PrePex circumcision surveillance: Adverse events and analgesia for device removal.
    Lebina L; Milovanovic M; Otwombe K; Abraham P; Manentsa M; Nzenze S; Martinson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194271. PubMed ID: 29579082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Safety Profile of PrePex Male Circumcision Device and Client Satisfaction With Adolescent Males Aged 13-17 Years in Zimbabwe.
    Tshimanga M; Hatzold K; Mugurungi O; Mangwiro T; Ncube G; Xaba S; Chatikobo P; Gundidza P; Samkange C; Dhlamini R; Murwira M; Gwinji G
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-42. PubMed ID: 27331588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safety, effectiveness and acceptability of the PrePex device for adult male circumcision in Kenya.
    Feldblum PJ; Odoyo-June E; Obiero W; Bailey RC; Combes S; Hart C; Jou Lai J; Fischer S; Cherutich P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e95357. PubMed ID: 24788898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huo ZC; Liu G; Li XY; Liu F; Fan WJ; Guan RH; Li PF; Mo DY; He YZ
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(3):362-367. PubMed ID: 26975486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Odor Level when Using PrePex for HIV Prevention: A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label, Blinded Assessor Trial to Improve Uptake of Male Circumcision.
    Mutabazi V; Bitega JP; Ngeruka LM; Karema C; Binagwaho A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126664. PubMed ID: 26023772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Research progress and application status of circumcision].
    Shi XQ; Lu LW; Fu D; Cheng W
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2023 Jun; 29(6):557-561. PubMed ID: 38602731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. One-arm, open-label, prospective, cohort field study to assess the safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for scale-up of nonsurgical circumcision when performed by nurses in resource-limited settings for HIV prevention.
    Mutabazi V; Kaplan SA; Rwamasirabo E; Bitega JP; Ngeruka ML; Savio D; Karema C; Binagwaho A
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Jul; 63(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 23466648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The safety profile and acceptability of a disposable male circumcision device in Kenyan men undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision.
    Musau P; Demirelli M; Muraguri N; Ndwiga F; Wainaina D; Ali NA
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1923-7. PubMed ID: 21944096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost Analysis of Adult Male Circumcision with the PrePex Device versus Surgery in Rwanda.
    Mutabazi V; Bitega JP; Muyenzi Ngeruka L; Nyemazi JP; Dain M; Kaplan SA; Karema C; Binagwaho A
    Urol Nurs; 2014; 34(6):303-11. PubMed ID: 26298926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Piloting PrePex for Adult and Adolescent Male Circumcision in South Africa--Pain Is an Issue.
    Lebina L; Taruberekera N; Milovanovic M; Hatzold K; Mhazo M; Nhlapo C; Tshabangu N; Manentsa M; Kazangarare V; Makola M; Billy S; Martinson N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138755. PubMed ID: 26405786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgical Outcomes of Newly Trained ShangRing Circumcision Providers.
    Awori QD; Lee RK; Li PS; Zulu R; Agot K; Combes S; Simba RO; Hart C; Lai JJ; Zyambo Z; Goldstein M; Feldblum PJ; Barone MA
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13-7. PubMed ID: 27331584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Introducing the Quill™ device for modified sleeve circumcision with subcutaneous suture: a retrospective study of 70 cases.
    Gu C; Tian F; Jia Z; Li G; Meng Z; Xing W; Ding Y; Jin Z; Kan Q; Yang J
    Urol Int; 2015; 94(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 25677813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acceptability and Satisfaction Associated With the Introduction of the PrePex Circumcision Device in Maputo, Mozambique.
    Cummings B; Necochea E; Ferreira T; Soares B; Mahomed M; Muquingue H; Nhambi L; Bossemeyer D; Ashengo TA
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S56-62. PubMed ID: 27331592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The safety and acceptance of the PrePex device for non-surgical adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. A non-randomized observational study.
    Kigozi G; Musoke R; Watya S; Kighoma N; Nkale J; Nakafeero M; Namuguzi D; Serwada D; Nalugoda F; Sewankambo N; Wawer MJ; Gray RH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e100008. PubMed ID: 25144194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical investigation of a novel surgical device for circumcision.
    Yuan Y; Zhang Z; Cui W; Gao B; Peng J; Xin Z; Guo Y
    J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1411-5. PubMed ID: 24423436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment.
    Barone MA; Li PS; Lee RK; Ouma D; Oundo M; Barasa M; Oketch J; Otiende P; Nyangweso N; Maina M; Kiswi N; Chirchir B; Goldstein M; Awori QD
    Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(4):324-331. PubMed ID: 30520424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring in children: outcomes of 824 cases].
    Yan B; You H; Zhang K; Tang HY; Mao W; He GH; Yin ZG
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Mar; 16(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 20369555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.