134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30010415)
21. Effects of inter-individual lumbar spine geometry variation on load-sharing: Geometrically personalized Finite Element study.
Naserkhaki S; Jaremko JL; El-Rich M
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2909-2917. PubMed ID: 27448498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computational model of the lumbar spine musculature: implications of spinal surgery.
Gatton ML; Pearcy MJ; Pettet GJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Feb; 26(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 20956031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Febio finite element models of the human cervical spine.
Herron MR; Park J; Dailey AT; Brockmeyer DL; Ellis BJ
J Biomech; 2020 Dec; 113():110077. PubMed ID: 33142209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Finite element analysis of the spondylolysis in lumbar spine.
Wang JP; Zhong ZC; Cheng CK; Chen CS; Yu CH; Chang TK; Wei SH
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 17075165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.
Ivanov AA; Kiapour A; Ebraheim NA; Goel V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E162-9. PubMed ID: 19247155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Zhang J; Pintar FA; Cusick JF; Wolfla CE; Maiman DJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Aug; 44(8):633-41. PubMed ID: 16937205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An Automated Method for Landmark Identification and Finite-Element Modeling of the Lumbar Spine.
Campbell JQ; Petrella AJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Nov; 62(11):2709-16. PubMed ID: 26080375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis.
Schmidt H; Heuer F; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 17997207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.
Rohlmann A; Nabil Boustani H; Bergmann G; Zander T
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2963-9. PubMed ID: 20696430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Construction and analysis of a finite element model of human L4-5 lumbar segment].
Yan W; Zhao G; Fang X; Guo H; Ma T; Tu Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 31(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 25219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.
Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Lee HM; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan; 56(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 25510758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method.
Zhong ZC; Wei SH; Wang JP; Feng CK; Chen CS; Yu CH
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jan; 28(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 16426979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated finite element modeling of the lumbar spine: Using a statistical shape model to generate a virtual population of models.
Campbell JQ; Petrella AJ
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2593-2599. PubMed ID: 27270207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.
Renner SM; Natarajan RN; Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Guo BY; Andersson GB; An HS
J Biomech; 2007; 40(6):1326-32. PubMed ID: 16843473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Low Back Pain: A Biomechanical Rationale Based on "Patterns" of Disc Degeneration.
Von Forell GA; Stephens TK; Samartzis D; Bowden AE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):1165-72. PubMed ID: 25996532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study.
Kulduk A; Altun NS; Senkoylu A
Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Numerical analysis of the influence of nucleus pulposus removal on the biomechanical behavior of a lumbar motion segment.
Huang J; Yan H; Jian F; Wang X; Li H
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1516-24. PubMed ID: 24893132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis.
Jahng TA; Kim YE; Moon KY
Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Finite element analysis on stress change of lumbar spine].
Yan JZ; Wu ZH; Wang XS; Xing ZJ; Song HF; Zhao Y; Zhang JG; Wang YP; Qiu GX
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 May; 89(17):1162-5. PubMed ID: 19595078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
