These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30010879)

  • 1. Corrigendum to 'Randomized trial of the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular prosthesis versus the Medtronic Mosaic aortic prosthesis: 10-year results' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;54:281--7].
    Zibdeh O; Bugg I; Patel S; Twine G; Unsworth-White J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Aug; 54(2):406. PubMed ID: 30010879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized trial of carpentier-edwards supraannular prosthesis versus mosaic aortic prosthesis: 6 year results.
    Birla R; Twine G; Unsworth-White J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):831-7. PubMed ID: 23201103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.
    Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Janusz MT; Ling H
    Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III145-52. PubMed ID: 1934404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Has altered design affected performance?
    Wilson ES; Jamieson MP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8834724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years.
    Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Macnab JS; Stanford E; Chan F; Janusz MT; Ling H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 130(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 16214510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corrigendum to 'A comparison of early redo surgery rates in Mosaic porcine and Perimount bovine pericardial valves' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy113].
    Webb J; Parkin D; Tøndel K; Simitsis P; Roxburgh J; Chambers JB
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 53(6):1301. PubMed ID: 29718306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corrigendum to 'The Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in young patients: a decision analysis' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:1180--6].
    Tam DY; Wijeysundera HC; Ouzounian M; Fremes SE
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jun; 55(6):1241. PubMed ID: 30778559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve in the supra annular aortic position. Results after 12 years in a series of 1108 patients].
    Logeais Y; Leguerrier A; Rioux C; Chaperon J; Lelong B; Langanay T; Delambre JF; el Issa A; Valla J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 Jun; 90(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 9295930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corrigendum to: 'Analysis of aortic area/height ratio in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and Type A dissection' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy110].
    Acharya MN; Youssefi P; Soppa G; Valencia O; Nowell J; Kanagasabay R; Edsell M; Morgan R; Tome M; Jahangiri M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 54(4):794. PubMed ID: 30101291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparison of Medtronic Mosaic and Carpentier-Edwards-SAV in the aortic position: an interim report.
    John A; Khan Z; Kuo J; Allen SM; Marchbank AJ; Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Lewis CT; Twine G; Edwards M; Unsworth-White J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 16784086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corrigendum to 'Mortality in trials on transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data' Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:221-9.
    Barili F; Freemantle N; Casado AP; Rinaldi M; Folliguet T; Musumeci F; Gerosa G; Parolari A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 58(2):409. PubMed ID: 32415776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corrigendum to: 'Contemporary results of aortic valve repair for congenital disease: lessons for management and staged strategy' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52(3):581-587].
    Vergnat M; Asfour B; Arenz C; Suchowerskyj P; Bierbach B; Schindler E; Schneider M; Hraska V
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 53(1):292. PubMed ID: 29186368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corrigendum to: 'Impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on radial strain in an ex vivo porcine model' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51(4):783--789].
    Nauta FJH; de Beaufort HWL; Conti M; Marconi S; Kamman AV; Ferrara A; van Herwaarden JA; Moll FL; Auricchio F; Trimarchi S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 53(6):1299. PubMed ID: 29718145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Andreas M; Wallner S; Ruetzler K; Wiedemann D; Ehrlich M; Heinze G; Binder T; Moritz A; Hiesmayr MJ; Kocher A; Laufer G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 48(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 25527170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
    Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corrigendum to 'Systematic lymphadenectomy versus sampling of ipsilateral mediastinal lymph-nodes during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of randomized trials and a meta-analysis' [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:1149-1156].
    Mokhles S; Macbeth F; Treasure T; Younes RN; Rintoul RC; Fiorentino F; Bogers AJJC; Takkenberg JJM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 54(4):795. PubMed ID: 30124846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
    Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.