240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30012047)
1. A Review on Differences in Effects on Normal and Malignant Cells and Tissues to Electroporation-Based Therapies: A Focus on Calcium Electroporation.
Frandsen SK; Gehl J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818788077. PubMed ID: 30012047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ESOPE-Equivalent Pulsing Protocols for Calcium Electroporation: An In Vitro Optimization Study on 2 Cancer Cell Models.
Romeo S; Sannino A; Scarfì MR; Vernier PT; Cadossi R; Gehl J; Zeni O
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818788072. PubMed ID: 30021498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normal and Malignant Cells Exhibit Differential Responses to Calcium Electroporation.
Frandsen SK; Krüger MB; Mangalanathan UM; Tramm T; Mahmood F; Novak I; Gehl J
Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 77(16):4389-4401. PubMed ID: 28760856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calcium electroporation for treatment of cutaneous metastases; a randomized double-blinded phase II study, comparing the effect of calcium electroporation with electrochemotherapy.
Falk H; Matthiessen LW; Wooler G; Gehl J
Acta Oncol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 28816072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of calcium electroporation in combination with metformin in vivo and correlation between viability and intracellular ATP level after calcium electroporation in vitro.
Frandsen SK; Gehl J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181839. PubMed ID: 28742810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calcium Electroporation: Evidence for Differential Effects in Normal and Malignant Cell Lines, Evaluated in a 3D Spheroid Model.
Frandsen SK; Gibot L; Madi M; Gehl J; Rols MP
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144028. PubMed ID: 26633834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calcium electroporation: The bioelectrochemical treatment of spontaneous equine skin tumors results in a local necrosis.
Galant L; Delverdier M; Lucas MN; Raymond-Letron I; Teissie J; Tamzali Y
Bioelectrochemistry; 2019 Oct; 129():251-258. PubMed ID: 31229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing the effectiveness of drug-based cancer therapy by electroporation (electropermeabilization).
Rabussay DP; Nanda GS; Goldfarb PM
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Feb; 1(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 12614180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comprehensive Review of Calcium Electroporation -A Novel Cancer Treatment Modality.
Frandsen SK; Vissing M; Gehl J
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 31991784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plasma membrane depolarization and permeabilization due to electric pulses in cell lines of different excitability.
Dermol-Černe J; Miklavčič D; Reberšek M; Mekuč P; Bardet SM; Burke R; Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P; O'Connor R
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():103-114. PubMed ID: 29621662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atorvastatin Modulates the Efficacy of Electroporation and Calcium Electrochemotherapy.
Szlasa W; Kiełbik A; Szewczyk A; Novickij V; Tarek M; Łapińska Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Rembiałkowska N
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 34681903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose-dependent ATP depletion and cancer cell death following calcium electroporation, relative effect of calcium concentration and electric field strength.
Hansen EL; Sozer EB; Romeo S; Frandsen SK; Vernier PT; Gehl J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122973. PubMed ID: 25853661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calcium electroporation and electrochemotherapy for cancer treatment: Importance of cell membrane composition investigated by lipidomics, calorimetry and in vitro efficacy.
Hoejholt KL; Mužić T; Jensen SD; Dalgaard LT; Bilgin M; Nylandsted J; Heimburg T; Frandsen SK; Gehl J
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4758. PubMed ID: 30894594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo electrical conductivity measurements during and after tumor electroporation: conductivity changes reflect the treatment outcome.
Ivorra A; Al-Sakere B; Rubinsky B; Mir LM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5949-63. PubMed ID: 19759406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference in Membrane Repair Capacity Between Cancer Cell Lines and a Normal Cell Line.
Frandsen SK; McNeil AK; Novak I; McNeil PL; Gehl J
J Membr Biol; 2016 Aug; 249(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 27312328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Operating Procedures of the Electrochemotherapy for Treatment of Tumor in Dogs and Cats.
Tozon N; Lampreht Tratar U; Znidar K; Sersa G; Teissie J; Cemazar M
J Vis Exp; 2016 Oct; (116):. PubMed ID: 27805594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ca
Navickaitė D; Ruzgys P; Maciulevičius M; Dijk G; O'Connor RP; Šatkauskas S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Dec; 142():107927. PubMed ID: 34425390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments.
Breton M; Mir LM
Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Feb; 33(2):106-23. PubMed ID: 21812011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Cisplatin Electrochemotherapy on Human Neuroblastoma Cells.
Esmekaya MA; Kayhan H; Coskun A; Canseven AG
J Membr Biol; 2016 Oct; 249(5):601-610. PubMed ID: 27021229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Explorative Study on Calcium Electroporation for Low-risk Basal Cell Carcinoma.
Wiegell SR; Hendel K; Fuchs CSK; Gehl J; Vissing M; Bro SW; Troelsen JT; Jemec GBE; Haedersdal M
Acta Derm Venereol; 2024 May; 104():adv19678. PubMed ID: 38712969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]