These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30012537)

  • 21. Automatic and robust noise suppression in EEG and MEG: The SOUND algorithm.
    Mutanen TP; Metsomaa J; Liljander S; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():135-151. PubMed ID: 29061529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neurochemistry-enriched dynamic causal models of magnetoencephalography, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Jafarian A; Hughes LE; Adams NE; Lanskey JH; Naessens M; Rouse MA; Murley AG; Friston KJ; Rowe JB
    Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 276():120193. PubMed ID: 37244323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian electromagnetic spatio-temporal imaging of extended sources with Markov Random Field and temporal basis expansion.
    Liu K; Yu ZL; Wu W; Gu Z; Li Y; Nagarajan S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():385-404. PubMed ID: 27355437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Localization of coherent sources by simultaneous MEG and EEG beamformer.
    Hong JH; Ahn M; Kim K; Jun SC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1121-35. PubMed ID: 23793511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Source reconstruction accuracy of MEG and EEG Bayesian inversion approaches.
    Belardinelli P; Ortiz E; Barnes G; Noppeney U; Preissl H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51985. PubMed ID: 23284840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterizing Inscapes and resting-state in MEG: Effects in typical and atypical development.
    Vandewouw MM; Dunkley BT; Lerch JP; Anagnostou E; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117524. PubMed ID: 33147510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flexible head-casts for high spatial precision MEG.
    Meyer SS; Bonaiuto J; Lim M; Rossiter H; Waters S; Bradbury D; Bestmann S; Brookes M; Callaghan MF; Weiskopf N; Barnes GR
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Jan; 276():38-45. PubMed ID: 27887969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A wavelet-based method for measuring the oscillatory dynamics of resting-state functional connectivity in MEG.
    Ghuman AS; McDaniel JR; Martin A
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 21256967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian model selection of template forward models for EEG source reconstruction.
    Strobbe G; van Mierlo P; De Vos M; Mijović B; Hallez H; Van Huffel S; López JD; Vandenberghe S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jun; 93 Pt 1():11-22. PubMed ID: 24582919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG.
    David O; Kiebel SJ; Harrison LM; Mattout J; Kilner JM; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1255-72. PubMed ID: 16473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrated MEG/fMRI model validated using real auditory data.
    Babajani-Feremi A; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Moran JE
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 18478325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of spatial pattern scale of brain activity on the sensitivity of DOT, fMRI, EEG and MEG.
    Perdue KL; Diamond SG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83299. PubMed ID: 24376684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stability of spectral estimates in resting-state magnetoencephalography: Recommendations for minimal data duration with neuroanatomical specificity.
    Wiesman AI; da Silva Castanheira J; Baillet S
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 247():118823. PubMed ID: 34923132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vector-based spatial-temporal minimum L1-norm solution for MEG.
    Huang MX; Dale AM; Song T; Halgren E; Harrington DL; Podgorny I; Canive JM; Lewis S; Lee RR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1025-37. PubMed ID: 16542857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode.
    Maldjian JA; Davenport EM; Whitlow CT
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():88-94. PubMed ID: 24699016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity.
    Liljeström M; Stevenson C; Kujala J; Salmelin R
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():75-87. PubMed ID: 26169324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MEG source reconstruction based on identification of directed source interactions on whole-brain anatomical networks.
    Fukushima M; Yamashita O; Knösche TR; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():408-27. PubMed ID: 25290887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.