These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30013469)

  • 1. Brain States That Encode Perceived Emotion Are Reproducible but Their Classification Accuracy Is Stimulus-Dependent.
    Bush KA; Gardner J; Privratsky A; Chung MH; James GA; Kilts CD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():262. PubMed ID: 30013469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Common Functional Brain States Encode both Perceived Emotion and the Psychophysiological Response to Affective Stimuli.
    Bush KA; Privratsky A; Gardner J; Zielinski MJ; Kilts CD
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15444. PubMed ID: 30337576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distributed Neural Processing Predictors of Multi-dimensional Properties of Affect.
    Bush KA; Inman CS; Hamann S; Kilts CD; James GA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():459. PubMed ID: 28959198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep neural network predicts emotional responses of the human brain from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kim HC; Bandettini PA; Lee JH
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():607-627. PubMed ID: 30366076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test of affect processing bias in response to affect regulation.
    Bush KA; Kilts CD
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264758. PubMed ID: 35239737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hot Speech and Exploding Bombs: Autonomic Arousal During Emotion Classification of Prosodic Utterances and Affective Sounds.
    Jürgens R; Fischer J; Schacht A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():228. PubMed ID: 29541045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining Physiological and Neuroimaging Measures to Predict Affect Processing Induced by Affectively Valent Image Stimuli.
    Wilson KA; James GA; Kilts CD; Bush KA
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9298. PubMed ID: 32518277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global Image Properties Predict Ratings of Affective Pictures.
    Redies C; Grebenkina M; Mohseni M; Kaduhm A; Dobel C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():953. PubMed ID: 32477228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS).
    Kurdi B; Lozano S; Banaji MR
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 26907748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying Core Affect in Individuals from fMRI Responses to Dynamic Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.
    Kim J; Wang J; Wedell DH; Shinkareva SV
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161589. PubMed ID: 27598534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sparse regularization techniques provide novel insights into outcome integration processes.
    Mohr H; Wolfensteller U; Frimmel S; Ruge H
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():163-76. PubMed ID: 25467302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear Discriminant Analysis Achieves High Classification Accuracy for the BOLD fMRI Response to Naturalistic Movie Stimuli.
    Mandelkow H; de Zwart JA; Duyn JH
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():128. PubMed ID: 27065832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of Intensive Valence and Arousal Affective States via Facial Electromyographic Activity in Young and Senior Adults.
    Tan JW; Andrade AO; Li H; Walter S; Hrabal D; Rukavina S; Limbrecht-Ecklundt K; Hoffman H; Traue HC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146691. PubMed ID: 26761427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distinct brain systems underlie the processing of valence and arousal of affective pictures.
    Nielen MM; Heslenfeld DJ; Heinen K; Van Strien JW; Witter MP; Jonker C; Veltman DJ
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 19665830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altered neural response of the appetitive emotional system in cocaine addiction: an fMRI Study.
    Asensio S; Romero MJ; Palau C; Sanchez A; Senabre I; Morales JL; Carcelen R; Romero FJ
    Addict Biol; 2010 Oct; 15(4):504-16. PubMed ID: 20579005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolutionary and Modern Image Content Differentially Influence the Processing of Emotional Pictures.
    Dhum M; Herwig U; Opialla S; Siegrist M; Brühl AB
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():415. PubMed ID: 28878638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transient and sustained BOLD signal time courses affect the detection of emotion-related brain activation in fMRI.
    Paret C; Kluetsch R; Ruf M; Demirakca T; Kalisch R; Schmahl C; Ende G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():522-532. PubMed ID: 25204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in neural activity when processing emotional arousal and valence in autism spectrum disorders.
    Tseng A; Wang Z; Huo Y; Goh S; Russell JA; Peterson BS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Feb; 37(2):443-61. PubMed ID: 26526072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: common and differential networks.
    Britton JC; Taylor SF; Sudheimer KD; Liberzon I
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):906-19. PubMed ID: 16488159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual Learning Induces Changes in Resting-State fMRI Multivariate Pattern of Information.
    Guidotti R; Del Gratta C; Baldassarre A; Romani GL; Corbetta M
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9786-98. PubMed ID: 26156982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.