120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30014316)
1. How social is social inhibition of return?
Atkinson MA; Millett AC; Doneva SP; Simpson A; Cole GG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1892-1903. PubMed ID: 30014316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation?
Atkinson MA; Simpson A; Skarratt PA; Cole GG
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():85-93. PubMed ID: 24859672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Knowledge of response location alone is not sufficient to generate social inhibition of return.
Welsh TN; Manzone J; McDougall L
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():153-9. PubMed ID: 25463556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: evidence from the joint Simon task.
Iani C; Anelli F; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97991. PubMed ID: 24897120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition.
de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 18387590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of predictability in cooperative and competitive joint action.
Glover S; Dixon P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28345943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.
Manzone J; Cole GG; Skarratt PA; Welsh TN
Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):1059-1071. PubMed ID: 27530404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Action co-representation and social exclusion.
Costantini M; Ferri F
Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 227(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 23543105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of motor coordination during joint action in mid-childhood.
Satta E; Ferrari-Toniolo S; Visco-Comandini F; Caminiti R; Battaglia-Mayer A
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Oct; 105():111-122. PubMed ID: 28454687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visualizing the temporal dynamics of spatial information processing responsible for the Simon effect and its amplification by inhibition of return.
Hilchey MD; Ivanoff J; Taylor TL; Klein RM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 20932500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults.
Shafaei R; Bahmani Z; Bahrami B; Vaziri-Pashkam M
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18107. PubMed ID: 33093544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The sociality of social inhibition of return.
Nafcha O; Shamay-Tsoory S; Gabay S
Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104108. PubMed ID: 31805469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of transients in action observation.
Cole GG; Welsh TN; Skarratt PA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2177-2191. PubMed ID: 31062298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial gradients of oculomotor inhibition of return in deaf and normal adults.
Jayaraman S; Klein RM; Hilchey MD; Patil GS; Mishra RK
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):323-30. PubMed ID: 26474575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
Welsh TN
Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
van der Weiden A; Aarts H; Prikken M; van Haren NE
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 26525711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cooperative and competitive contexts do not modify the effect of social intention on motor action.
Quesque F; Mignon A; Coello Y
Conscious Cogn; 2017 Nov; 56():91-99. PubMed ID: 28697981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ideomotor action in cooperative and competitive settings.
Häberle A; Schütz-Bosbach S; Laboissière R; Prinz W
Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 18633844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A role of goals for social inhibition of return?
Janczyk M; Welsh TN; Dolk T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2402-2418. PubMed ID: 26536175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
