These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect. Klempova B; Liepelt R Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 25833374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account. Dolk T; Hommel B; Prinz W; Liepelt R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1248-60. PubMed ID: 23339346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: Comparing human and machine co-agents. Sahaï A; Desantis A; Grynszpan O; Pacherie E; Berberian B Conscious Cogn; 2019 Jan; 67():44-55. PubMed ID: 30522081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task. McClung JS; Jentzsch I; Reicher SD PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79178. PubMed ID: 24278119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing. Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Action or attention in social inhibition of return? Doneva SP; Atkinson MA; Skarratt PA; Cole GG Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 26708498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Joint Simon effects for non-human co-actors. Stenzel A; Liepelt R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):143-58. PubMed ID: 26486640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour. Welsh TN; McDougall LM; Weeks DJ Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 19406547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action. Porcu E; Bölling L; Lappe M; Liepelt R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):972-7. PubMed ID: 27016344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias. Wang B; Yan C; Klein RM; Wang Z Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 29247423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces. Klempova B; Liepelt R Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1158-1176. PubMed ID: 28689319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Event-related potentials during individual, cooperative, and competitive task performance differ in subjects with analytic vs. holistic thinking. Apanovich VV; Bezdenezhnykh BN; Sams M; Jääskeläinen IP; Alexandrov Y Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():136-142. PubMed ID: 28986326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Social exclusion impairs distractor suppression but not target enhancement in selective attention. Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Fan L; Zhang L; Yuan S; Yang D Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Nov; 121():72-79. PubMed ID: 28601652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Sebanz N; Knoblich G Top Cogn Sci; 2009 Apr; 1(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 25164938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Disarming the gunslinger effect: Reaction beats intention for cooperative actions. Weller L; Kunde W; Pfister R Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):761-766. PubMed ID: 29623572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]