These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30015137)

  • 1. Dissociating decision strategies in free-choice tasks - A mouse tracking analysis.
    Vogel D; Scherbaum S; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():65-71. PubMed ID: 30015137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):943-74. PubMed ID: 20822210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus-response links and the backward crosstalk effect - A comparison of forced- and free-choice tasks.
    Naefgen C; Caissie AF; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():23-29. PubMed ID: 28448839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Melcher T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 20875631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.
    Naefgen C; Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 29850924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.
    Naefgen C; Dambacher M; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 28776264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection.
    Janczyk M; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():49-54. PubMed ID: 24816271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intention and attention in ideomotor learning.
    Herwig A; Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 18932052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task intentions and their implementation into actions: cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood.
    Poljac E; Haartsen R; van der Cruijsen R; Kiesel A; Poljac E
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):215-229. PubMed ID: 29026993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between-task competition for intentions and actions.
    Millington RS; Poljac E; Yeung N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1504-16. PubMed ID: 23170906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-action effect binding: A critical re-assessment.
    Weller L; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():137-146. PubMed ID: 28942126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Movements or targets: what makes an action in action-effect learning?
    Hoffmann J; Lenhard A; Sebald A; Pfister R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2433-49. PubMed ID: 19526438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contributions of expected sensory and affective action effects to action selection and performance: Evidence from forced- and free-choice tasks.
    Hommel B; Lippelt DP; Gurbuz E; Pfister R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):821-827. PubMed ID: 27519674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks.
    Kübler S; Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 28856434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of mood on integration of information in a multi-attribute decision task.
    Shevchenko Y; Bröder A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():136-145. PubMed ID: 29477895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No differences in dual-task costs between forced- and free-choice tasks.
    Janczyk M; Nolden S; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 24947757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.
    Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 20192535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.