These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Are great apes able to reason from multi-item samples to populations of food items? Eckert J; Rakoczy H; Call J Am J Primatol; 2017 Oct; 79(10):. PubMed ID: 28877364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios. Uher J; Call J J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 18489236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. Jordan KE; Brannon EM J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Nov; 95(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 16808924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition. Walco DK; Risen JL Psychol Sci; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1807-1820. PubMed ID: 29040055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production. Bizo LA; Chu JY; Sanabria F; Killeen PR Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):201-10. PubMed ID: 16386378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects. Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative quantity judgments between discrete spatial arrays by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and New Zealand robins (Petroica longipes). Garland A; Beran MJ; McIntyre J; Low J J Comp Psychol; 2014 Aug; 128(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 24749501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chimpanzees sometimes see fuller as better: judgments of food quantities based on container size and fullness. Parrish AE; Beran MJ Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():184-91. PubMed ID: 24374384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants. Xu F; Garcia V Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Apr; 105(13):5012-5. PubMed ID: 18378901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing matters! The neural signature of intuitive judgments differs according to the way information is presented. Horr NK; Braun C; Zander T; Volz KG Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 38():71-87. PubMed ID: 26529680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]