These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30015801)
1. Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis by Gradient of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in the Peritumoral Brain Zone Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging. She D; Xing Z; Cao D J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 30015801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation between glioblastomas and brain metastases and regarding their primary site of malignancy using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI at 3T. Askaner K; Rydelius A; Engelholm S; Knutsson L; Lätt J; Abul-Kasim K; Sundgren PC J Neuroradiol; 2019 Nov; 46(6):367-372. PubMed ID: 30389510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of solitary brain metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme: a predictive multiparametric approach using combined MR diffusion and perfusion. Bauer AH; Erly W; Moser FG; Maya M; Nael K Neuroradiology; 2015 Jul; 57(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 25845813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic examination performance by using microvascular leakage, cerebral blood volume, and blood flow derived from 3-T dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in the differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and brain metastasis. Server A; Orheim TE; Graff BA; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH Neuroradiology; 2011 May; 53(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 20625709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of cerebral blood flow gradient in peritumoral edema for differentiation of glioblastomas from solitary metastatic lesions. Lin L; Xue Y; Duan Q; Sun B; Lin H; Huang X; Chen X Oncotarget; 2016 Oct; 7(42):69051-69059. PubMed ID: 27655705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrimination between Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis: Comparison of Inflow-Based Vascular-Space-Occupancy and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Imaging. Li X; Wang D; Liao S; Guo L; Xiao X; Liu X; Xu Y; Hua J; Pillai JJ; Wu Y AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Apr; 41(4):583-590. PubMed ID: 32139428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme, metastases and primary central nervous system lymphomas using multiparametric perfusion and diffusion MR imaging of a tumor core and a peritumoral zone-Searching for a practical approach. Neska-Matuszewska M; Bladowska J; Sąsiadek M; Zimny A PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191341. PubMed ID: 29342201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of survival in patients affected by glioblastoma: histogram analysis of perfusion MRI. Romano A; Pasquini L; Di Napoli A; Tavanti F; Boellis A; Rossi Espagnet MC; Minniti G; Bozzao A J Neurooncol; 2018 Sep; 139(2):455-460. PubMed ID: 29721752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DSC-PWI presurgical differentiation of grade 4 astrocytoma and glioblastoma in young adults: rCBV percentile analysis across enhancing and non-enhancing regions. Pons-Escoda A; Naval-Baudin P; Viveros M; Flores-Casaperalta S; Martinez-Zalacaín I; Plans G; Vidal N; Cos M; Majos C Neuroradiology; 2024 Aug; 66(8):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 38834877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object. Stokes AM; Semmineh NB; Nespodzany A; Bell LC; Quarles CC Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):109-123. PubMed ID: 31400035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI. Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual inspection of MR relative cerebral blood volume maps has limited value for distinguishing progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma multiforme patients. Kerkhof M; Tans PL; Hagenbeek RE; Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ; Holla FK; Postma TJ; Straathof CS; Dirven L; Taphoorn MJ; Vos MJ CNS Oncol; 2017 Oct; 6(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 28984142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI in differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and neoangiogenesis in cerebral metastases using rCBV, rCBF and K2. Muto M; Frauenfelder G; Senese R; Zeccolini F; Schena E; Giurazza F; Jäger HR Radiol Med; 2018 Jul; 123(7):545-552. PubMed ID: 29508242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of EPI-based distortion correction of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI on cerebral blood volume estimation in patients with glioblastoma. Hovden IT; Geier OM; Digernes I; Fuster-Garcia E; Løvland G; Vik-Mo E; Meling TR; Emblem KE Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109278. PubMed ID: 33010685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiparametric imaging-based differentiation of lymphoma and glioblastoma: using T1-perfusion, diffusion, and susceptibility-weighted MRI. Saini J; Kumar Gupta P; Awasthi A; Pandey CM; Singh A; Patir R; Ahlawat S; Sadashiva N; Mahadevan A; Kumar Gupta R Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):986.e7-986.e15. PubMed ID: 30197047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of rCBV in glioblastomas using T2*-weighted perfusion MRI: an evaluation of sampling, normalization, and experience. Yüzkan S; Mutlu S; Karagülle M; Şam Özdemir M; Özgül H; Arıkan MA; Koçak B Diagn Interv Radiol; 2024 Mar; 30(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 37789677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential for differentiation of pseudoprogression from true tumor progression with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using ferumoxytol vs. gadoteridol: a pilot study. Gahramanov S; Raslan AM; Muldoon LL; Hamilton BE; Rooney WD; Varallyay CG; Njus JM; Haluska M; Neuwelt EA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Feb; 79(2):514-23. PubMed ID: 20395065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bidirectional Contrast agent leakage correction of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI improves cerebral blood volume estimation and survival prediction in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Leu K; Boxerman JL; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Pope WB; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 26971534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-grade and low-grade gliomas: differentiation by using perfusion MR imaging. Hakyemez B; Erdogan C; Ercan I; Ergin N; Uysal S; Atahan S Clin Radiol; 2005 Apr; 60(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 15767107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]