These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30016141)
1. A purpose-designed monofilament-fibre pad for debridement of hard-to-reach wounds: experience in clinical practice. Dissemond J; Eberlein T; Bültemann A; Riepe G; Stoffels I; Stephen-Haynes J; Roes C; Abel M J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(7):421-425. PubMed ID: 30016141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy of a new monofilament fibre-containing wound debridement product. Bahr S; Mustafi N; Hättig P; Piatkowski A; Mosti G; Reimann K; Abel M; Dini V; Restelli J; Babadagi-Hardt Z; Abbritti F; Eberlein T; Wild T; Bandl K J Wound Care; 2011 May; 20(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 21647069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An audit to assess the impact of prescribing a monofilament fibre debridement pad for patients with unhealed wounds after six months. Burnett J; Kerr A; Morrison M; Ruston A J Wound Care; 2021 May; 30(5):381-388. PubMed ID: 33979215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of a monofilament wound debridement pad at removing biofilm and slough: ex vivo and clinical performance. Schultz GS; Woo K; Weir D; Yang Q J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 29424644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a monofilament debridement pad in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Eberlein T; Wiegand C; Andriessen A; Roes C; Abel M J Wound Care; 2019 Nov; 28(11):780-783. PubMed ID: 31721661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro Evaluation of the Cleansing Effect of a Monofilament Fiber Debridement Pad Compared to Gauze Swabs. Wiegand C; Reddersen K; Hipler UC; Abel M; Ruth P; Andriessen A Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2016; 29(6):318-323. PubMed ID: 28095386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance and safety of a debridement pad with abrasive and non-abrasive fibres. Stürmer E; Debus ES; Atkin L J Wound Care; 2024 Jun; 33(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 38843013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofilm management using monofilament fibre debridement technology: outcomes and clinician and patient satisfaction. Roes C; Calladine L; Morris C J Wound Care; 2019 Sep; 28(9):608-622. PubMed ID: 31513491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The wound debrider: a new monofilament fibre technology. Haemmerle G; Duelli H; Abel M; Strohal R Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S35-6, S38, S40-2. PubMed ID: 21471903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a gelling fibre dressing in complex surgical or chronic wounds: a case series. Ivins N; Braumann C; Kirchhoff JB; Waldemar U; Jones NJ J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(7):444-454. PubMed ID: 30016138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Debrisoft(®) Monofilament Debridement Pad for Use in Acute or Chronic Wounds: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance. Meads C; Lovato E; Longworth L Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Dec; 13(6):583-94. PubMed ID: 26315567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New techniques for wound debridement. Madhok BM; Vowden K; Vowden P Int Wound J; 2013 Jun; 10(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 23418808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Debrisoft is a wound debridement product, not a wound dressing. Browning A Nurs Stand; 2014 May; 28(36):35. PubMed ID: 24802464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds. Wood L; Wood Z; Davis P; Wilkins J J Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 19(7):287-8, 290-3. PubMed ID: 20616771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Workload and prevalence of open wounds in the community: French Vulnus initiative. Meaume S; Kerihuel JC; Fromantin I; Téot L J Wound Care; 2012 Feb; 21(2):62, 64, 66 passim. PubMed ID: 22584525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The different methods of wound debridement. Stephen-Haynes J; Thompson G Br J Community Nurs; 2007 Jun; 12(6):S6, S8-10, S12-14, S16. PubMed ID: 17577156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the efficacy of novel non-invasive mechanical debridement methods - sterile sponge, monofilament fibre cloth and non-woven cloth impregnated with sodium hyaluronate and phospholipids in relation to traditional sterile gauze. Nowak M; Mehrholz D; Antoszewska M; Barańska-Rybak W Postepy Dermatol Alergol; 2022 Oct; 39(5):856-864. PubMed ID: 36457665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]