250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30016146)
1. Yield of Learning Opportunities From a Radiology Random Peer Review Program.
Trinh TW; Shinagare AB; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):630-634. PubMed ID: 30016146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving Radiology Peer Learning: Comparing a Novel Electronic Peer Learning Tool and a Traditional Score-Based Peer Review System.
Trinh TW; Boland GW; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 30403533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer Learning in Radiology: Effect of a Pay-for-Performance Initiative on Clinical Impact and Usage.
Zhao AH; Burk KS; Enamandram SS; Hanson R; Boland GW; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1659-1667. PubMed ID: 33787297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of a peer-learning program in an academic abdominal radiology practice and comparison with a traditional peer-review system.
Ludwig DR; Strnad BS; Bierhals AJ; Mellnick VM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jul; 47(7):2509-2519. PubMed ID: 35482105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.
O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Jun; 28(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 26892609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random Versus Nonrandom Peer Review: A Case for More Meaningful Peer Review.
Itri JN; Donithan A; Patel SH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 29807816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Error Categorization at Abdominal Imaging Peer Learning Conference.
Del Gaizo AJ; Itri JN; Pendergrast TE; Tappouni R
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(6):535-542. PubMed ID: 30244814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current Status and Future Wish List of Peer Review: A National Questionnaire of U.S. Radiologists.
Lee CS; Neumann C; Jha P; Baumgarten DA; Chu L; Surovitsky M; Kadom N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):493-497. PubMed ID: 31939700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences.
Ngo AV; Stanescu AL; Swenson DW; Moore MM; Sze RW; Iyer RS
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):526-530. PubMed ID: 30923885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study.
O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Jul; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23822583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overnight radiology resident discrepancies at a large pediatric hospital: categorization by year of training, program, imaging modality, and report type.
Dinh ML; Yazdani R; Godiyal N; Pfeifer CM
Acta Radiol; 2022 Jan; 63(1):122-126. PubMed ID: 33406888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integration of Peer Review in PACS Results in a Marked Increase in the Discrepancies Reported.
Yacoub JH; Obara P; Bova D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):613-617. PubMed ID: 31846375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer learning in emergency radiology: effects on learning, error identification, and radiologist experience.
Schmidt E; Lo HS; Saghir A
Emerg Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 35391565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of a Peer Learning Program Replacing Score-Based Peer Review in a Multispecialty Integrated Practice.
Sharpe RE; Huffman RI; Congdon RG; Plunkett LA; Tschumper BA; Stewart DT; Bode EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):949-956. PubMed ID: 30207788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
Strickland NH
Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.
Weinberg BD; Richter MD; Champine JG; Morriss MC; Browning T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 25557573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
