These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30016330)

  • 1. Detection of cooperatively bound transcription factor pairs using ChIP-seq peak intensities and expectation maximization.
    Datta V; Siddharthan R; Krishna S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199771. PubMed ID: 30016330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.
    Lai FJ; Jhu MH; Chiu CC; Huang YM; Wu WS
    BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 25559499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Properly defining the targets of a transcription factor significantly improves the computational identification of cooperative transcription factor pairs in yeast.
    Wu WS; Lai FJ
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S10. PubMed ID: 26679776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MixChIP: a probabilistic method for cell type specific protein-DNA binding analysis.
    Rautio S; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():413. PubMed ID: 26703974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ChIPXpress: using publicly available gene expression data to improve ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip target gene ranking.
    Wu G; Ji H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 14():188. PubMed ID: 23758851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation for transcription factor binding predictions based on deep learning.
    Qin Q; Feng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005403. PubMed ID: 28234893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
    Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring functional transcription factor-gene binding pairs by integrating transcription factor binding data with transcription factor knockout data.
    Yang TH; Wu WS
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S13. PubMed ID: 24565265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping functional transcription factor networks from gene expression data.
    Haynes BC; Maier EJ; Kramer MH; Wang PI; Brown H; Brent MR
    Genome Res; 2013 Aug; 23(8):1319-28. PubMed ID: 23636944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcription Factor Binding Site Mapping Using ChIP-Seq.
    Jaini S; Lyubetskaya A; Gomes A; Peterson M; Tae Park S; Raman S; Schoolnik G; Galagan J
    Microbiol Spectr; 2014 Apr; 2(2):. PubMed ID: 26105820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and multiplex sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to identify global transcription factor binding sites in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Brdlik CM; Niu W; Snyder M
    Methods Enzymol; 2014; 539():89-111. PubMed ID: 24581441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. De novo motif discovery facilitates identification of interactions between transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Chen MJ; Chou LC; Hsieh TT; Lee DD; Liu KW; Yu CY; Oyang YJ; Tsai HK; Chen CY
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 28(5):701-8. PubMed ID: 22238267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From binding motifs in ChIP-Seq data to improved models of transcription factor binding sites.
    Kulakovskiy I; Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Bryzgalov L; Vorontsov I; Makeev V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):1340004. PubMed ID: 23427986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A conserved role for transcription factor sumoylation in binding-site selection.
    Rosonina E
    Curr Genet; 2019 Dec; 65(6):1307-1312. PubMed ID: 31093693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.