These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30017152)

  • 1. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions.
    Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30017152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limited evidence suggests complete arch digital scans are less time efficient than conventional impression.
    Sedky A; Abd-Elwahab Radi I
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(4):138-139. PubMed ID: 33339976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions.
    Benic GI; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):777-782. PubMed ID: 27460321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.
    Benic GI; Sailer I; Zeltner M; Gütermann JN; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 30396708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow.
    Seelbach P; Brueckel C; Wöstmann B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Sep; 17(7):1759-64. PubMed ID: 23086333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 30037692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows.
    Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30264050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated from conventional impressions and digital scans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Morsy N; El Kateb M; Azer A; Fathalla S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 34696907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions.
    Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26548890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A crossover clinical trial.
    Lee SJ; Jamjoom FZ; Le T; Radics A; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 33602542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Treatment Time for Single-Implant Crowns Between Digital and Conventional Workflows for Posterior Implant Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Jarangkul W; Kunavisarut C; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Joda T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 39(2):286-293. PubMed ID: 37910827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized clinical trial of a conventional and a digital workflow for the fabrication of interim crowns: An evaluation of treatment efficiency, fit, and the effect of clinician experience.
    Cheng CW; Ye SY; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P; Ko CC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 32057487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.