These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30017910)

  • 1. Practical identifiability and uncertainty quantification of a pulsatile cardiovascular model.
    Marquis AD; Arnold A; Dean-Bernhoft C; Carlson BE; Olufsen MS
    Math Biosci; 2018 Oct; 304():9-24. PubMed ID: 30017910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-specific parameter estimation in single-ventricle lumped circulation models under uncertainty.
    Schiavazzi DE; Baretta A; Pennati G; Hsia TY; Marsden AL
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 27155892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practical identifiability analysis of a minimal cardiovascular system model.
    Pironet A; Docherty PD; Dauby PC; Chase JG; Desaive T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Apr; 171():53-65. PubMed ID: 28153466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parameter estimation for closed-loop lumped parameter models of the systemic circulation using synthetic data.
    Bjørdalsbakke NL; Sturdy JT; Hose DR; Hellevik LR
    Math Biosci; 2022 Jan; 343():108731. PubMed ID: 34758345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing parameter identifiability in compartmental dynamic models using a computational approach: application to infectious disease transmission models.
    Roosa K; Chowell G
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2019 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 30642334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Electrophysiological Models: Impact of Physiological Variability on Action Potential and Spiral Wave Dynamics.
    Pathmanathan P; Galappaththige SK; Cordeiro JM; Kaboudian A; Fenton FH; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2020; 11():585400. PubMed ID: 33329034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of arterial wall models and measurement uncertainties on cardiovascular model predictions.
    Eck VG; Sturdy J; Hellevik LR
    J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 50():188-194. PubMed ID: 27890534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.
    Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
    Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural identifiability analysis of a cardiovascular system model.
    Pironet A; Dauby PC; Chase JG; Docherty PD; Revie JA; Desaive T
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 May; 38(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 26970891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular regulation in response to multiple hemorrhages: analysis and parameter estimation.
    Ciocanel MV; Docken SS; Gasper RE; Dean C; Carlson BE; Olufsen MS
    Biol Cybern; 2019 Apr; 113(1-2):105-120. PubMed ID: 30209563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated model calibration with parallel MCMC: Applications for a cardiovascular system model.
    Argus F; Zhao D; Babarenda Gamage TP; Nash MP; Maso Talou GD
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():1018134. PubMed ID: 36439250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making Predictions Using Poorly Identified Mathematical Models.
    Simpson MJ; Maclaren OJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 May; 86(7):80. PubMed ID: 38801489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty quantification in coronary blood flow simulations: Impact of geometry, boundary conditions and blood viscosity.
    Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Choi G; Taylor CA
    J Biomech; 2016 Aug; 49(12):2540-7. PubMed ID: 26803339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of 1-D models of pulmonary hemodynamics in mice under control and hypertensive conditions.
    Colebank MJ; Umar Qureshi M; Olufsen MS
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Nov; 37(11):e3242. PubMed ID: 31355521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of an Experimental and Digital Cardiovascular Arterial Model for Transient Hemodynamic and Postural Change Studies: "A Preliminary Framework Analysis".
    Hewlin RL; Kizito JP
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 29124548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Computational FFR Estimation in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Fossan FE; Sturdy J; Müller LO; Strand A; Bråten AT; Jørgensen A; Wiseth R; Hellevik LR
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):597-622. PubMed ID: 30382522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainty quantification implementations in human hemodynamic flows.
    Ninos G; Bartzis V; Merlemis N; Sarris IE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 May; 203():106021. PubMed ID: 33721602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A methodological paradigm for patient-specific multi-scale CFD simulations: from clinical measurements to parameter estimates for individual analysis.
    Pant S; Fabrèges B; Gerbeau JF; Vignon-Clementel IE
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1614-48. PubMed ID: 25345820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.