179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30018095)
1. Short-term and long-term revision rates after lumbar spine discectomy versus laminectomy: a population-based cohort study.
Kao FC; Hsu YC; Wang CB; Tu YK; Liu PH
BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e021028. PubMed ID: 30018095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study.
Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Kim MJ; Park BJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):581-90. PubMed ID: 23023591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.
Malter AD; McNeney B; Loeser JD; Deyo RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 9563113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lumbar discectomy is associated with higher rates of lumbar fusion.
Castillo H; Chintapalli RTV; Boyajian HH; Cruz SA; Morgan VK; Shi LL; Lee MJ
Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):487-492. PubMed ID: 29792995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is academic department teaching status associated with adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy for degenerative spine diseases?
Perfetti DC; Job AV; Satin AM; Katz AD; Silber JS; Essig DA
Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 32445804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?
Virk SS; Diwan A; Phillips FM; Sandhu H; Khan SN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2752-2762. PubMed ID: 28849429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reoperation Rates After Single-level Lumbar Discectomy.
Heindel P; Tuchman A; Hsieh PC; Pham MH; D'Oro A; Patel NN; Jakoi AM; Hah R; Liu JC; Buser Z; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(8):E496-E501. PubMed ID: 27548580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital charges associated with "never events": comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty.
Daniels AH; Kawaguchi S; Contag AG; Rastegar F; Waagmeester G; Anderson PA; Arthur M; Hart RA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 26989978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reoperation rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical degenerative diseases: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan.
Lin JH; Chien LN; Tsai WL; Chen LY; Hsieh YC; Chiang YH
Spine J; 2016 Dec; 16(12):1428-1436. PubMed ID: 27520080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
Wong AP; Shih P; Smith TR; Slimack NP; Dahdaleh NS; Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; Smith ZA; Scheer JK; Koski TR; Liu JC; Fessler RG
World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A population-based study of reoperations after back surgery.
Hu RW; Jaglal S; Axcell T; Anderson G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(19):2265-70; discussion 2271. PubMed ID: 9346147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.
Arshi A; Wang C; Park HY; Blumstein GW; Buser Z; Wang JC; Shamie AN; Park DY
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1180-1187. PubMed ID: 29155340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.
Weinstein JN; Lurie JD; Olson PR; Bronner KK; Fisher ES
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):2707-14. PubMed ID: 17077740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year follow-up results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy.
Li Z; Tang J; Hou S; Ren D; Li L; Lu X; Hou T
J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 22(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 25443080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reoperation rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy: a propensity-matched analysis.
Lubelski D; Healy AT; Silverstein MP; Abdullah KG; Thompson NR; Riew KD; Steinmetz MP; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1277-83. PubMed ID: 25720729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geographic and Hospital Variation in Cost of Lumbar Laminectomy and Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Conditions.
Zygourakis CC; Liu CY; Wakam G; Moriates C; Boscardin C; Ames CP; Mummaneni PV; Ratliff J; Dudley RA; Gonzales R
Neurosurgery; 2017 Aug; 81(2):331-340. PubMed ID: 28327960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision rates and complication incidence in single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures: an administrative database study.
Veeravagu A; Cole T; Jiang B; Ratliff JK
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1125-31. PubMed ID: 24126076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.
Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():89-95. PubMed ID: 27919762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting.
Hirsch BP; Khechen B; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(8):E494-E499. PubMed ID: 30234800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?
Martin BI; Mirza SK; Comstock BA; Gray DT; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2119-26. PubMed ID: 17762814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
