144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30018902)
1. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.
Jung Y; Lee AR; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Park DC; Park EK
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2018 Jul; 61(4):477-488. PubMed ID: 30018902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The concordance between colposcopic biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedures in patients with known smear cytology and human papillomavirus results.
Gezer S; Kanbay Ozturk S; Balci S; Yucesoy I
North Clin Istanb; 2021; 8(6):588-594. PubMed ID: 35284797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histopathological discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and LEEP-conization observed during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Pruski D; Przybylski M; Millert-Kalinska S; Zmaczynski A; Jach R
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 36043301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) following cervical biopsy diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Aly FZ; Irhayyim A; Knapik J; Klein R
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2021; 14(12):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 35027995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Kim SI; Kim SJ; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 31(2):e13. PubMed ID: 31912671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of colposcopic punch biopsy in the management of abnormal cervical cytology: a 5-year retrospective audit.
Kahramanoglu I; Demirkiran F; Turan H; Bese T; Yilmaz N; Ilvan S; Arvas M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 30230394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Large Retrospective Study of 12714 Cases of LEEP Conization Focusing on Cervical Cancer That Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy Failed to Detect.
Cong Q; Song Y; Wang Q; Zhang H; Gao S; Du M; Xie F; Dong J; Feng H; Diao W; Zhu C; Sui L
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5138232. PubMed ID: 29854761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absence or Presence of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Cervical Conization Specimens: A Clinicopathologic Study of 540 Cases.
Walavalkar V; Stockl T; Owens CL; Manning M; Papa D; Li A; Khan A; Liu Y
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Jan; 145(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 26712876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?
Bradbury M; Rabasa J; Murcia MT; Dinarès MC; Sainz A; Castellet C; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A; Centeno C
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Jan; 26(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 34928250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the consistency ratios of cervical smear, cervical biopsy and conization results.
Keskin N; Biyik I; Ince O; Gokten H; Simsek S; Soysal C; Erten O
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(11):778-783. PubMed ID: 33914320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Ding J; Xu H; Xia L; Cao S; Wu Q
Front Surg; 2021; 8():721545. PubMed ID: 34616768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ding Z; Li Y; Chen A; Song M; Zhang Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():32-36. PubMed ID: 27816739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure under colposcopic vision.
Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravati S; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
J Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Mar; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 19471663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human papillomavirus type 16 causes larger colposcopic lesions than other HPV types in patients with grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nam K; Kwak J; Kim J; Jeon S
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Jan; 17(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 23222045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A LEEP cervical conization is rarely indicated for a two-step discrepancy.
Lanneau GS; Skaggs V; Moore K; Stowell S; Zuna R; Gold MA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Jul; 11(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 17596756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the colposcopically directed punch biopsy a reliable diagnostic test in women with minor cytological lesions?
Moss EL; Hadden P; Douce G; Jones PW; Arbyn M; Redman CW
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Oct; 16(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 22669079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure biopsy in patients with biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nam K; Ryu A; Jeon S; Kim J; Kwak J; Park B
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 25105718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
