BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30018980)

  • 21. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigation of iterative image reconstruction in low-dose breast CT.
    Bian J; Yang K; Boone JM; Han X; Sidky EY; Pan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(11):2659-85. PubMed ID: 24786683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simultaneous correction of sensitivity and spatial resolution in projection-based magnetic particle imaging.
    Murase K
    Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1845-1859. PubMed ID: 32003025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
    Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization.
    Sidky EY; Pan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4777-807. PubMed ID: 18701771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Reconstruction Algorithms for Decreasing the Exposure Dose During Digital Tomosynthesis for Arthroplasty: a Phantom Study.
    Gomi T; Sakai R; Goto M; Watanabe Y; Takeda T; Umeda T
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 26943661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Realistic Breast Phantom Proposal for 3D Image Reconstruction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Polat A; Kumrular RK
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221104567. PubMed ID: 36071652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a Generative Adversarial Network to Improve Image Quality and Reduce Radiation-Dose during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Gomi T; Kijima Y; Kobayashi T; Koibuchi Y
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Glick SJ; D'Orsi CJ; Baker SP; Webber RL
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1085-97. PubMed ID: 11131053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reconstruction of sparse-view X-ray computed tomography using adaptive iterative algorithms.
    Liu L; Lin W; Jin M
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jan; 56():97-106. PubMed ID: 25464352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multi-beam X-ray source breast tomosynthesis reconstruction with different algorithms.
    Zhou W; Qian X; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2010; 7622():76220H. PubMed ID: 27053823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT.
    Makeev A; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081904. PubMed ID: 23927318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. DIR-DBTnet: Deep iterative reconstruction network for three-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Su T; Deng X; Yang J; Wang Z; Fang S; Zheng H; Liang D; Ge Y
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 33594671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.