170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30021329)
1. Estimation of bus emission models for different fuel types of buses under real conditions.
Wang C; Ye Z; Yu Y; Gong W
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 640-641():965-972. PubMed ID: 30021329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of real-driving emissions for buses fueled with liquefied natural gas based on gradient boosted regression trees.
Pan Y; Chen S; Qiao F; Ukkusuri SV; Tang K
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():741-750. PubMed ID: 30743960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On-road pollutant emission and fuel consumption characteristics of buses in Beijing.
Wang A; Ge Y; Tan J; Fu M; Shah AN; Ding Y; Zhao H; Liang B
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21520811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the influence of contributing factors and impact degree on bus emissions in real-world conditions.
Wang C; Ye Z; Bi H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(27):36092-36101. PubMed ID: 33682059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical and Chemical Characterization of Real-World Particle Number and Mass Emissions from City Buses in Finland.
Pirjola L; Dittrich A; Niemi JV; Saarikoski S; Timonen H; Kuuluvainen H; Järvinen A; Kousa A; Rönkkö T; Hillamo R
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jan; 50(1):294-304. PubMed ID: 26682775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding and estimating the carbon dioxide emissions for urban buses at different road locations: A comparison between new-energy buses and conventional diesel buses.
Pan Y; Qiao F; Tang K; Chen S; Ukkusuri SV
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 703():135533. PubMed ID: 31767339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-world operation conditions and on-road emissions of Beijing diesel buses measured by using portable emission measurement system and electric low-pressure impactor.
Liu Z; Ge Y; Johnson KC; Shah AN; Tan J; Wang C; Yu L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(8):1476-80. PubMed ID: 21295821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vehicle measurement of ultrafine particles on compressed natural gas, conventional diesel, and oxidation-catalyst diesel heavy-duty transit buses.
Hammond D; Jones S; Lalor M
Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Feb; 125(1-3):239-46. PubMed ID: 17219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Particle and gaseous emissions from compressed natural gas and ultralow sulphur diesel-fuelled buses at four steady engine loads.
Jayaratne ER; Ristovski ZD; Meyer N; Morawska L
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2845-52. PubMed ID: 19185331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of on-road emissions for hybrid and regular transit buses.
Hallmark SL; Wang B; Sperry R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Oct; 63(10):1212-20. PubMed ID: 24282974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-use fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses in Iowa.
Hallmark S; Sperry B; Mudgal A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21608490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critical analysis of high particle number emissions from accelerating compressed natural gas buses.
Jayaratne ER; Meyer NK; Ristovski ZD; Morawska L; Miljevic B
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3724-31. PubMed ID: 20384333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating gaseous pollutants from bus emissions: A hybrid model based on GRU and XGBoost.
Hu L; Wang C; Ye Z; Wang S
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 783():146870. PubMed ID: 33866159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion charging measurements on exhaust solid particle number and lung deposited surface area of compressed natural gas and diesel buses.
Eisazadeh H; Ehteram MA; Khazaee I
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(14):16929-16939. PubMed ID: 32144706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing on-road emissions from urban buses in different traffic congestion scenarios by integrating real-world driving, traffic, and emissions data.
Rosero F; Fonseca N; Mera Z; López JM
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 863():161002. PubMed ID: 36535483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Hybrid Electric Bus SCR System Operation and NO
Yang Q; Hu QY; Huang C; Chen Y; Liu JD; Li L; Xiong ZL; Tang W
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Oct; 39(10):4463-4471. PubMed ID: 30229592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real-world NOx emissions from heavy-duty diesel, natural gas, and diesel hybrid electric vehicles of different vocations on California roadways.
McCaffery C; Zhu H; Tang T; Li C; Karavalakis G; Cao S; Oshinuga A; Burnette A; Johnson KC; Durbin TD
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 784():147224. PubMed ID: 33905931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling transit bus fuel consumption on the basis of cycle properties.
Delgado OF; Clark NN; Thompson GJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Apr; 61(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 21516939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gaseous emissions from compressed natural gas buses in urban road and highway tests in China.
Yue T; Chai F; Hu J; Jia M; Bao X; Li Z; He L; Zu L
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Oct; 48():193-199. PubMed ID: 27745664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fresh and Oxidized Emissions from In-Use Transit Buses Running on Diesel, Biodiesel, and CNG.
Watne ÅK; Psichoudaki M; Ljungström E; Le Breton M; Hallquist M; Jerksjö M; Fallgren H; Jutterström S; Hallquist ÅM
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 52(14):7720-7728. PubMed ID: 29894174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
