These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30022026)

  • 1. Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits.
    Greene AS; Gao S; Scheinost D; Constable RT
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jul; 9(1):2807. PubMed ID: 30022026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A human brain atlas derived via n-cut parcellation of resting-state and task-based fMRI data.
    James GA; Hazaroglu O; Bush KA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 26523655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-induced brain connectivity promotes the detection of individual differences in brain-behavior relationships.
    Jiang R; Zuo N; Ford JM; Qi S; Zhi D; Zhuo C; Xu Y; Fu Z; Bustillo J; Turner JA; Calhoun VD; Sui J
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 207():116370. PubMed ID: 31751666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic functional connectivity during task performance and rest predicts individual differences in attention across studies.
    Fong AHC; Yoo K; Rosenberg MD; Zhang S; Li CR; Scheinost D; Constable RT; Chun MM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():14-25. PubMed ID: 30521950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting individual traits from unperformed tasks.
    Gal S; Tik N; Bernstein-Eliav M; Tavor I
    Neuroimage; 2022 Apr; 249():118920. PubMed ID: 35051583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional connectivity of intrinsic cognitive networks during resting state and task performance in preadolescent children.
    Jiang P; Vuontela V; Tokariev M; Lin H; Aronen ET; Ma Y; Carlson S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205690. PubMed ID: 30332489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying a task-invariant cognitive reserve network using task potency.
    van Loenhoud AC; Habeck C; van der Flier WM; Ossenkoppele R; Stern Y
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116593. PubMed ID: 32007499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.
    Cole MW; Ito T; Cocuzza C; Sanchez-Romero R
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(12):2684-2702. PubMed ID: 33542083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining fMRI during resting state and an attention bias task in children.
    Harrewijn A; Abend R; Linke J; Brotman MA; Fox NA; Leibenluft E; Winkler AM; Pine DS
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116301. PubMed ID: 31639510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct functional and structural connections predict crystallised and fluid cognition in healthy adults.
    Dhamala E; Jamison KW; Jaywant A; Dennis S; Kuceyeski A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jul; 42(10):3102-3118. PubMed ID: 33830577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional brain networks related to individual differences in human intelligence at rest.
    Hearne LJ; Mattingley JB; Cocchi L
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():32328. PubMed ID: 27561736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased cognitive complexity reveals abnormal brain network activity in individuals with corpus callosum dysgenesis.
    Hearne LJ; Dean RJ; Robinson GA; Richards LJ; Mattingley JB; Cocchi L
    Neuroimage Clin; 2019; 21():101595. PubMed ID: 30473430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity?
    Finn ES; Scheinost D; Finn DM; Shen X; Papademetris X; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 160():140-151. PubMed ID: 28373122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks.
    Elliott ML; Knodt AR; Cooke M; Kim MJ; Melzer TR; Keenan R; Ireland D; Ramrakha S; Poulton R; Caspi A; Moffitt TE; Hariri AR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():516-532. PubMed ID: 30708106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time.
    Vidaurre D; Smith SM; Woolrich MW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12827-12832. PubMed ID: 29087305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity.
    Finn ES; Shen X; Scheinost D; Rosenberg MD; Huang J; Chun MM; Papademetris X; Constable RT
    Nat Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 18(11):1664-71. PubMed ID: 26457551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration.
    Schultz DH; Cole MW
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(33):8551-61. PubMed ID: 27535904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metastable neural dynamics underlies cognitive performance across multiple behavioural paradigms.
    Alderson TH; Bokde ALW; Kelso JAS; Maguire L; Coyle D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Aug; 41(12):3212-3234. PubMed ID: 32301561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconfiguration of Brain Network Architectures between Resting-State and Complexity-Dependent Cognitive Reasoning.
    Hearne LJ; Cocchi L; Zalesky A; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(35):8399-8411. PubMed ID: 28760864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimodal evaluation of the amygdala's functional connectivity.
    Kerestes R; Chase HW; Phillips ML; Ladouceur CD; Eickhoff SB
    Neuroimage; 2017 Mar; 148():219-229. PubMed ID: 28089676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.