308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30022571)
1. Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: The free-summer study.
Piona C; Dovc K; Mutlu GY; Grad K; Gregorc P; Battelino T; Bratina N
Pediatr Diabetes; 2018 Nov; 19(7):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 30022571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of using flash glucose monitoring technology by children and young people with type 1 diabetes in a single arm study.
Campbell FM; Murphy NP; Stewart C; Biester T; Kordonouri O
Pediatr Diabetes; 2018 Nov; 19(7):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 30054967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Addition of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring to standard care in a cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: effect on glycaemic control and pregnancy outcomes.
Perea V; Picón MJ; Megia A; Goya M; Wägner AM; Vega B; Seguí N; Montañez MD; Vinagre I
Diabetologia; 2022 Aug; 65(8):1302-1314. PubMed ID: 35546211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of factory-calibrated Freestyle Libre System with new glucose algorithm measurement accuracy and clinical performance in children with type 1 diabetes during summer camp.
Szadkowska A; Michalak A; Łosiewicz A; Kuśmierczyk H; Krawczyk-Rusiecka K; Chrzanowski J; Gawrecki A; Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz D; Fendler W
Pediatr Diabetes; 2021 Mar; 22(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 33034075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter Randomized Trial of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Recent-Onset Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the LIBERATES Trial.
Ajjan RA; Heller SR; Everett CC; Vargas-Palacios A; Higham R; Sharples L; Gorog DA; Rogers A; Reynolds C; Fernandez C; Rodrigues P; Sathyapalan T; Storey RF; Stocken DD
Diabetes Care; 2023 Feb; 46(2):441-449. PubMed ID: 36516054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy, satisfaction and usability of a flash glucose monitoring system among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending a summer camp.
Hansen EA; Klee P; Dirlewanger M; Bouthors T; Elowe-Gruau E; Stoppa-Vaucher S; Phan-Hug F; Antoniou MC; Pasquier J; Dwyer AA; Pitteloud N; Hauschild M
Pediatr Diabetes; 2018 Nov; 19(7):1276-1284. PubMed ID: 30014625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of unblinded and blinded intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.
Guo L; Li Y; Zhang M; Xiao X; Kuang H; Yang T; Jia X; Zhang X
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1110845. PubMed ID: 36909344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Requirements with the Use of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Reddy M; Oliver N
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Mar; 22(3):235-238. PubMed ID: 31833786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of 6 Months of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and High-Risk Glycemic Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Boucher SE; Gray AR; Wiltshire EJ; de Bock MI; Galland BC; Tomlinson PA; Rayns JA; MacKenzie KE; Chan H; Rose S; Wheeler BJ
Diabetes Care; 2020 Oct; 43(10):2388-2395. PubMed ID: 32788281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of 12-Week Freestyle Libre 2.0 in Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated HbA1c: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Jefferies CA; Boucsein A; Styles SE; Chamberlain B; Michaels VR; Crockett HR; De Lange M; Lala A; Cunningham V; Wiltshire EJ; Serlachius AS; Wheeler BJ
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2023 Dec; 25(12):827-835. PubMed ID: 37782139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: A subgroup analysis from the FLASH-UK study.
Leelarathna L; Sutton CJ; Evans ML; Neupane S; Rayman G; Lumley S; Cranston I; Narendran P; Krishan A; Taxiarchi VP; Barnard-Kelly K; Elliott RA; Burns M; Camm M; Thabit H; Wilmot EG;
Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15249. PubMed ID: 37897112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventional Evidence.
Seidu S; Kunutsor SK; Ajjan RA; Choudhary P
Diabetes Care; 2024 Jan; 47(1):169-179. PubMed ID: 38117991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced hybrid closed loop therapy versus conventional treatment in adults with type 1 diabetes (ADAPT): a randomised controlled study.
Choudhary P; Kolassa R; Keuthage W; Kroeger J; Thivolet C; Evans M; Ré R; de Portu S; Vorrink L; Shin J; Habteab A; Castañeda J; da Silva J; Cohen O;
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2022 Oct; 10(10):720-731. PubMed ID: 36058207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J
Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in young people with high-risk type 1 diabetes-Extension phase outcomes following a 6-month randomized control trial.
Rose S; Styles SE; Wiltshire EJ; Stanley J; Galland BC; de Bock MI; Tomlinson PA; Rayns JA; MacKenzie KE; Wheeler BJ
Diabet Med; 2022 May; 39(5):e14756. PubMed ID: 34862661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Prevention of Recurrent Severe Hypoglycemia.
Davis TME; Dwyer P; England M; Fegan PG; Davis WA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 May; 22(5):367-373. PubMed ID: 31724878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. To evaluate the use and clinical effect of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: Results of a multicentre study.
Moreno-Fernandez J; Sastre J; Pinés P; Calderon-Vicente D; Gargallo J; Muñoz-Rodriguez JR
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed); 2023 Apr; 70(4):270-276. PubMed ID: 37116972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the glycaemic outcomes between real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults and children with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhou Y; Sardana D; Kuroko S; Haszard JJ; de Block MI; Weng J; Jefferies C; Wheeler BJ
Diabet Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):e15280. PubMed ID: 38197238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adult type 1 diabetes patients with suboptimal glycaemic control: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
Yan J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Zheng M; Lu J; Luo S; Yang D; Deng H; Xu W; Bi Y; Bao W; Weng J
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2023 May; 39(4):e3614. PubMed ID: 36670050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
