These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30022889)
41. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680. Tran MT; Hoang K; Greaves RF Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 27527571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparative analysis of calculating sigma metrics by a trueness verification proficiency testing-based approach and an internal quality control data inter-laboratory comparison-based approach. Li R; Wang T; Gong L; Peng P; Yang S; Zhao H; Xiong P J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Nov; 33(9):e22989. PubMed ID: 31386228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluating the analytical quality control of urinary albumin measurements using sigma metrics. Wang H; Ma Y; Shan X Clin Biochem; 2019 Nov; 73():109-111. PubMed ID: 31351987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Sigma metrics analysis of serology screening assays to enhance quality and efficiency in New Zealand blood services. Scheurich G; Bhatnagar S; Westgard S Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Oct; 110(2):116451. PubMed ID: 39053050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Quality requirements for veterinary hematology analyzers in small animals-a survey about veterinary experts' requirements and objective evaluation of analyzer performance based on a meta-analysis of method validation studies: bench top hematology analyzer. Cook AM; Moritz A; Freeman KP; Bauer N Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 45(3):466-76. PubMed ID: 27428874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Sigma metrics computed by three bias estimation approaches for 33 chemistry and 26 immunoassay analytes. Ercan Ş Adv Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 4(3):236-245. PubMed ID: 38162416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Application of the sigma metrics to evaluate the analytical performance of cystatin C and design a quality control strategy. Liu Q; Zhu W; Bian G; Liang W; Zhao C; Yang F Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 May; 58(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 33393354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality control in a clinical chemistry laboratory. Kumar BV; Mohan T J Lab Physicians; 2018; 10(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 29692587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. Westgard JO; Westgard SA Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 125(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16613337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The Evaluation of the Quality Performance of Biochemical Analytes in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Using Six Sigma Matrices. Panda CR; Kumari S; Mangaraj M; Nayak S Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e51386. PubMed ID: 38292960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance using the MQ-2000 PT HbA1c analyzer. Huysal K; Budak YU Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 26527591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Six SIGMA evaluation of 17 biochemistry parameters using bias calculated from internal quality control and external quality assurance data. Çevlik T; Haklar G J Med Biochem; 2024 Jan; 43(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 38496028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Application of biological variation and six sigma models to evaluate analytical quality of six HbA Wang X; Wen D; Wang W; Suo M; Hu T Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol; 2019 Dec; 47(1):3598-3602. PubMed ID: 31456424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of the performance of a micromethod for measuring urinary iodine by using six sigma quality metrics. Hussain H; Khalid NM; Selamat R; Wan Nazaimoon WM Ann Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 33(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 24003421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessing quality on the Sigma scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys. Westgard JO; Westgard SA Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Sep; 53(10):1531-5. PubMed ID: 25719323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Analysis of performance of clinical biochemistry laboratory using Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index. Goel P; Malik G; Prasad S; Rani I; Manhas S; Goel K Pract Lab Med; 2021 Jan; 23():e00195. PubMed ID: 33392370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sigma Metrics used to Evaluate the Performance of Internal Quality Control in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory. Han Z; Zhou WQ; Mao WL; Zheng WW Clin Lab; 2020 Dec; 66(12):. PubMed ID: 33337832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Sigma metrics application for validated and non-validated detecting systems performance assessment. Xia Y; Li M; Li B; Xue H; Lin Y; Li J; Ji L J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Mar; 35(3):e23676. PubMed ID: 33314338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Mistaken assumptions drive new Six Sigma model off the road. Westgard S; Bayat H; Westgard JO Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Feb; 29(1):010903. PubMed ID: 30591817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quantitative application of sigma metrics in medical biochemistry. Nanda SK; Ray L J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Dec; 7(12):2689-91. PubMed ID: 24551613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]