These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30022889)

  • 61. Expected long-term defect rate of analytical performance in the medical laboratory: Assured Sigma
    Bayat H
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Jun; 28(2):020101. PubMed ID: 30022877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Sigma metrics in laboratory medicine revisited: We are on the right road with the wrong map.
    Oosterhuis WP; Coskun A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Jun; 28(2):020503. PubMed ID: 30022880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Assessment of quality control system by sigma metrics and quality goal index ratio: A roadmap towards preparation for NABL.
    Verma M; Dahiya K; Ghalaut VS; Dhupper V
    World J Methodol; 2018 Nov; 8(3):44-50. PubMed ID: 30519539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Prostate-specific antigen: bias and molarity of commercial assays for PSA in use in England.
    Roddam AW; Rimmer J; Nickerson C; Ward AM;
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Jan; 43(Pt 1):35-48. PubMed ID: 16390608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Development and use of analytical quality specifications in the in vitro diagnostics medical device industry.
    Powers DM; Greenberg N
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 10667695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Evaluation of Sigma metric approach for monitoring the performance of automated analyzers in hematology unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital.
    Ahmed El-Neanaey W; Mahmoud AbdEllatif N; Abdel Haleem Abo Elwafa R
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 34275191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Analytical goals developed from the inherent error of medical tests.
    Ross JW; Fraser MD
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1481-93; discussion 1493-4. PubMed ID: 8330410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Analytical performance evaluation of sensitive and old generation reagent in routine practical use: estradiol experience.
    Yaman H; Bozkurt Yavuz H; Karahan SC; Örem A; Katkat M; Aytekin Garip S
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2022 Apr; 82(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 35167775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A Novel Approach for Routinely Assessing Laboratory Sigma Metrics for a Broad Range of Automated Assays.
    Miller JJ; Gammie AJ
    J Appl Lab Med; 2024 May; 9(3):477-492. PubMed ID: 38391346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance in clinical biochemistry laboratory in India: a pilot study.
    Singh B; Goswami B; Gupta VK; Chawla R; Mallika V
    Indian J Clin Biochem; 2011 Apr; 26(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 22468038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Determination of sigma score based on biological variation for haemostasis assays: fit-for-purpose for daily practice?
    Hollestelle MJ; Ruinemans-Koerts J; Idema RN; Meijer P; de Maat MPM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Jul; 57(8):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 30838837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Six Sigma Quality Management System and Design of Risk-based Statistical Quality Control.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 28153372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Sigma Metrics Across the Total Testing Process.
    Charuruks N
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 28153373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings.
    Zhou B; Wu Y; He H; Li C; Tan L; Cao Y
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Jan; 34(1):e23126. PubMed ID: 31774217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Performance specifications for sodium should not be based on biological variation.
    Oosterhuis WP; Coskun A; Sandberg S; Theodorsson E
    Clin Chim Acta; 2023 Feb; 540():117221. PubMed ID: 36640931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A next generation enzymatic magnesium assay on the Abbott ARCHITECT chemistry system meets performance goals based on biological variation.
    Bailey D; Martens P; Mah W; Yip PM
    Clin Biochem; 2014 Jan; 47(1-2):142-4. PubMed ID: 24121059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics.
    Park H; Ko Y
    Ann Lab Med; 2021 Sep; 41(5):447-454. PubMed ID: 33824232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The Application of Six Sigma Techniques in the Evaluation of Enzyme Measurement Procedures in China.
    Zhang C; Zhao H; Wang J; Zeng J; Wang Z
    Clin Lab; 2015; 61(5-6):461-5. PubMed ID: 26118176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Assessment of Sigma Metrics for Routine Chemistry Testing in 4 Laboratories in Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa.
    Moodley N; Gounden V
    J Appl Lab Med; 2022 May; 7(3):689-697. PubMed ID: 34636901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Fifth Generation Quality Control of Immunoassay Parameters by Six Sigma Value.
    Ain QU; Younas M; Haroon ZH; Kirmani SI; Munir MU; Anwar M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Jun; 33(6):679-683. PubMed ID: 37300265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.