847 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024102)
1. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jun; 67(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 30114716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nalluri N; Atti V; Munir AB; Karam B; Patel NJ; Kumar V; Vemula P; Edla S; Asti D; Paturu A; Gayam S; Spagnola J; Barsoum E; Maniatis GA; Tamburrino F; Kandov R; Lafferty J; Kliger C
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 31(5):661-671. PubMed ID: 29781182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.
Al-Abcha A; Saleh Y; Boumegouas M; Prasad R; Herzallah K; Baloch ZQ; Abdelkarim O; Rayamajhi S; Abela GS
Am J Cardiol; 2021 May; 146():74-81. PubMed ID: 33529615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gozdek M; Raffa GM; Suwalski P; Kolodziejczak M; Anisimowicz L; Kubica J; Navarese EP; Kowalewski M;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 53(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 29029105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of Concomitant Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: Insights From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry.
Sathananthan J; Murdoch DJ; Lindman BR; Zajarias A; Jaber WA; Cremer P; Wood D; Moss R; Cheung A; Ye J; Hahn RT; Crowley A; Leon MB; Mack MJ; Webb JG
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 29929637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. TAVR for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using a Self-Expanding Device: 1-Year Results From the Prospective VIVA Postmarket Study.
Tchétché D; Chevalier B; Holzhey D; Harnath A; Schäfer U; Teiger E; Manigold T; Modine T; Souteyrand G; Champagnac D; Oh JK; Li S; Verhoye JP; Kornowski R;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(10):923-932. PubMed ID: 31122349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses.
Silaschi M; Wendler O; Seiffert M; Castro L; Lubos E; Schirmer J; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Schäfer U; Treede H; MacCarthy P; Conradi L
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27624351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
