These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024123)

  • 1. Validity of electrical impedance myography to estimate percent body fat: comparison to bio-electrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    van Rassel CR; Bewski NA; O'loughlin EK; Wright A; Scheel DP; Puig L; Kakinami L
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Apr; 59(4):632-639. PubMed ID: 30024123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison whole-body muscle mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance in overweight and obese adults].
    Wang ZH; Dong YH; Yang YD; Wang S; Ma J
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 51(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 28260334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of the accuracy and reliability of body composition assessed with a handheld electrical impedance myography device.
    McLester CN; Dewitt AD; Rooks R; McLester JR
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Jul; 18(6):763-771. PubMed ID: 29544083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese Brazilian women.
    Braulio VB; Furtado VC; Silveira Md; Fonseca MH; Oliveira JE
    Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol; 2010 Jun; 54(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20625652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance accurately tracks direction of adiposity change in overweight and obese 7- to 13-year-old children.
    Kasvis P; Cohen TR; Loiselle SÈ; Kim N; Hazell TJ; Vanstone CA; Rodd C; Plourde H; Weiler HA
    Nutr Res; 2015 Mar; 35(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 25697463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
    Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
    Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of consistency in measurement of body fat percentage by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in overweight and obese adults in China].
    Wang Z; Fu L; Yang Y; Wang S; Ma J
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 36(7):701-4. PubMed ID: 26564697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body Composition Measurement in Bronchiectasis: Comparison between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Skinfold Thickness Measurement, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry before and after Pulmonary Rehabilitation.
    Doña E; Olveira C; Palenque FJ; Porras N; Dorado A; Martín-Valero R; Godoy AM; Espíldora F; Contreras V; Olveira G
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Aug; 118(8):1464-1473. PubMed ID: 29656933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as an alternative to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of fat mass and appendicular lean mass in patients with obesity.
    Ballesteros-Pomar MD; González-Arnáiz E; Pintor-de-la Maza B; Barajas-Galindo D; Ariadel-Cobo D; González-Roza L; Cano-Rodríguez I
    Nutrition; 2022 Jan; 93():111442. PubMed ID: 34482097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry among obese patients.
    Faria SL; Faria OP; Cardeal MD; Ito MK
    Obes Surg; 2014 Sep; 24(9):1476-80. PubMed ID: 24464546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.
    Shafer KJ; Siders WA; Johnson LK; Lukaski HC
    Nutrition; 2009 Jan; 25(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18723322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obese Colombian adults.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; Tordecilla-Sanders A; Correa-Bautista JE; González-Ruíz K; González-Jiménez E; Triana-Reina HR; García-Hermoso A; Schmidt-RioValle J
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 28987018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis in overweight and obese children and parents.
    Goldfield GS; Cloutier P; Mallory R; Prud'homme D; Parker T; Doucet E
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2006 Sep; 46(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 16998450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percentage of body fat assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a weight loss program for obese or overweight Chinese adults.
    Li YC; Li CI; Lin WY; Liu CS; Hsu HS; Lee CC; Chen FN; Li TC; Lin CC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e58272. PubMed ID: 23573189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body Composition Assessment in Male and Female Bodybuilders: A 4-Compartment Model Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Impedance-Based Devices.
    Graybeal AJ; Moore ML; Cruz MR; Tinsley GM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1676-1689. PubMed ID: 30161092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body fat percent assessment between electrical impedance myography and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Czeck MA; Raymond-Pope CJ; Prescott E; Bisch KL; Dengel DR
    Am J Hum Biol; 2020 Mar; 32(2):e23330. PubMed ID: 31566850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study.
    Buckinx F; Reginster JY; Dardenne N; Croisiser JL; Kaux JF; Beaudart C; Slomian J; Bruyère O
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():60. PubMed ID: 25887598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a Bioelectrical Impedance Device against the Reference Method Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Anthropometry for the Evaluation of Body Composition in Adults.
    Day K; Kwok A; Evans A; Mata F; Verdejo-Garcia A; Hart K; Ward LC; Truby H
    Nutrients; 2018 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 30308974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.
    Boneva-Asiova Z; Boyanov MA
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 18435776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proportional bias between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis varies based on sex in active adults consuming high- and low-carbohydrate diets.
    Tinsley GM
    Nutr Res; 2017 Jun; 42():85-100. PubMed ID: 28633874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.