These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024177)

  • 1. Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.
    Eva B; Hartmann S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):806-821. PubMed ID: 30024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():305-330. PubMed ID: 31514580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rational hypocrisy: a Bayesian analysis based on informal argumentation and slippery slopes.
    Rai TS; Holyoak KJ
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 24646370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models.
    Piantadosi ST; Tenenbaum JB; Goodman ND
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jul; 123(4):392-424. PubMed ID: 27077241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.
    Prakken H
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1068-1091. PubMed ID: 30873711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. People Like Logical Truth: Testing the Intuitive Detection of Logical Value in Basic Propositions.
    Nakamura H; Kawaguchi J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0169166. PubMed ID: 28036402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian perspective on constructing a written assessment of probabilistic clinical reasoning in experienced clinicians.
    Kreiter CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 26486941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.
    Straßer C; Michajlova L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1133998. PubMed ID: 37275534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Logical intuition is not really about logic.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S; Newman IR; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2009-2028. PubMed ID: 35130014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model.
    Singmann H; Klauer KC; Over D
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():316. PubMed ID: 24860516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradigms, possibilities, and probabilities: Comment on Hinterecker, Knauff, and Johnson-Laird (2016).
    Oaksford M; Over D; Cruz N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):288-297. PubMed ID: 30688496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probabilistic conditional reasoning: Disentangling form and content with the dual-source model.
    Singmann H; Klauer KC; Beller S
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():61-87. PubMed ID: 27416493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.
    Oaksford M; Hahn U
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15285597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Erb CD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.