BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024226)

  • 1. Perceptual biases during cued task switching relate to decision process differences between children and adults.
    Martinez JE; Mack ML; Bauer JR; Roe MA; Church JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1603-1618. PubMed ID: 30024226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age differences in foraging and executive functions: A cross-sectional study.
    Ólafsdóttir IM; Gestsdóttir S; Kristjánsson Á
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104910. PubMed ID: 32622069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining bilingual language switching across the lifespan in cued and voluntary switching contexts.
    de Bruin A; Samuel AG; Duñabeitia JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):759-788. PubMed ID: 32324035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.
    Shepherdson P; Oberauer K; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):286-310. PubMed ID: 28557495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.
    Whitehead PS; Ooi MM; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 30938591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring developmental differences in visual short-term memory and working memory.
    Ang SY; Lee K
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):279-85. PubMed ID: 20053024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional flexibility is imbalanced: Asymmetric cost for switches between external and internal attention.
    Verschooren S; Liefooghe B; Brass M; Pourtois G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1399-1414. PubMed ID: 31343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and the role of attention in associative learning.
    Mutter SA; Holder JM; Mashburn CA; Luna CM
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 30058825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistent Performance Differences between Children and Adults Despite Manipulation of Cue-Target Variables.
    Bauer JR; Martinez JE; Roe MA; Church JA
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1304. PubMed ID: 28824489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining the role of action-driven attention in ensemble processing.
    Knox K; Pratt J; Cant JS
    J Vis; 2024 Jun; 24(6):5. PubMed ID: 38842835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual foraging and executive functions: A developmental perspective.
    Ólafsdóttir IM; Gestsdóttir S; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():203-213. PubMed ID: 30660998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
    Wiegand I; Seidel C; Wolfe J
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):805-820. PubMed ID: 31414857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preparatory Engagement of Cognitive Control Networks Increases Late in Childhood.
    Church JA; Bunge SA; Petersen SE; Schlaggar BL
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Mar; 27(3):2139-2153. PubMed ID: 26972753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.