These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024243)

  • 1. Procedural Frames in Negotiations: How Offering My Resources Versus Requesting Yours Impacts Perception, Behavior, and Outcomes: Correction to Trötschel et al. (2015).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):275. PubMed ID: 30024243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedural frames in negotiations: how offering my resources versus requesting yours impacts perception, behavior, and outcomes.
    Trötschel R; Loschelder DD; Höhne BP; Majer JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 108(3):417-435. PubMed ID: 25751716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open to offers, but resisting requests: How the framing of anchors affects motivation and negotiated outcomes.
    Majer JM; Trötschel R; Galinsky AD; Loschelder DD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Sep; 119(3):582-599. PubMed ID: 31556681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of buyer-seller interactions: a conceptual framework and research agenda.
    Ahearne M; Atefi Y; Lam SK; Pourmasoudi M
    J Acad Mark Sci; 2022; 50(1):22-45. PubMed ID: 34608341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is straightforwardness a liability in negotiations? The role of integrative potential and structural power.
    Derue DS; Conlon DE; Moon H; Willaby HW
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1032-47. PubMed ID: 19594242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands.
    Tuncel E; Kong DT; McLean Parks J; van Kleef GA
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2020 Nov; 161():255-273. PubMed ID: 32958980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Self-regulation to Successfully Overcome the Negotiation Disadvantage of Low Power.
    Jäger A; Loschelder DD; Friese M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():271. PubMed ID: 28382005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "The accumulation of stereotype-based self-fulfilling prophecies": Correction to Madon et al. (2018).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 116(1):68. PubMed ID: 30596447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unpacking buyer-seller differences in valuation from experience: A cognitive modeling approach.
    Pachur T; Scheibehenne B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1742-1773. PubMed ID: 28265866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.
    Dobrić I
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 30665489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precious Property or Magnificent Money? How Money Salience but Not Temperature Priming Affects First-Offer Anchors in Economic Transactions.
    Leusch YM; Loschelder DD; Basso F
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1099. PubMed ID: 30022962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.
    Galinsky AD; Mussweiler T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Oct; 81(4):657-69. PubMed ID: 11642352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Falsifiability is not optional": Correction to LeBel et al. (2017).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):696. PubMed ID: 29016165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unilateral concessions from the other party: concession behavior, attributions, and negotiation judgments.
    Kwon S; Weingart LR
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 15065974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach": Correction to Finkel et al. (2017).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):768. PubMed ID: 29016166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Six habits of merely effective negotiators.
    Sebenius JK
    Harv Bus Rev; 2001 Apr; 79(4):87-95, 168. PubMed ID: 11299696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complex and Concurrent Negotiations for Multiple Interrelated e-Markets.
    Sim KM
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2013 Feb; 43(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 22907968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Claiming a large slice of a small pie: asymmetric disconfirmation in negotiation.
    Larrick RP; Wu G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 93(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 17645396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements.
    Bottom WP
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Nov; 76(2):89-112. PubMed ID: 9831517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Buyer and seller data from pay what you want and name your own price laboratory markets.
    Krämer F; Schmidt KM; Spann M; Stich L
    Data Brief; 2017 Jun; 12():513-517. PubMed ID: 28516147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.