BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024249)

  • 1. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The metamemory expectancy illusion in source monitoring affects metamemory control and memory.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104468. PubMed ID: 33160240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inconsistency effects in source memory and compensatory schema-consistent guessing.
    Küppers V; Bayen UJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2042-59. PubMed ID: 24628718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):975-1000. PubMed ID: 34726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion.
    Mieth L; Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bell R
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 32734524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source attributions for detected new items: Persistent evidence for schematic guessing.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1407-1422. PubMed ID: 32075493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    Metacogn Learn; 2023; 18(1):55-80. PubMed ID: 35968027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: a test of the probability-matching account.
    Arnold NR; Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 23224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of Source - Item Contingency and Schematic Knowledge on Source Monitoring: Tests of the Probability-Matching Account.
    Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Mem Lang; 2011 Jan; 64(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 21603251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotional modulation of episodic memory in school-age children and adults: Emotional items and their associated contextual details.
    Massol S; Vantaggio S; Chainay H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1684-1703. PubMed ID: 32039622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information.
    Wulff L; Bell R; Mieth L; Kuhlmann BG
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):416-426. PubMed ID: 33726623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective and retrospective episodic metamemory in posttraumatic stress disorder.
    Sacher M; Tudorache AC; Clarys D; Boudjarane M; Landré L; El-Hage W
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Nov; 40(9):865-873. PubMed ID: 29536791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: the role of perceived differences in item recognition.
    Meiser T; Sattler C; Von Hecker U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jul; 60(7):1015-40. PubMed ID: 17616917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading.
    Hu X; Luo L; Fleming SM
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104012. PubMed ID: 31271925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.