These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024250)

  • 1. What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.
    Vergauwe E; Ricker TJ; Langerock N; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):779-794. PubMed ID: 30024250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for spontaneous serial refreshing in verbal working memory?
    Vergauwe E; Langerock N; Cowan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):674-680. PubMed ID: 28983860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A (further) test of spontaneous serial refreshing in verbal and spatial working memory.
    Vergauwe E; Langerock N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1600-1611. PubMed ID: 36456796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The episodic flanker effect: Memory retrieval as attention turned inward.
    Logan GD; Cox GE; Annis J; Lindsey DRB
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Apr; 128(3):397-445. PubMed ID: 33939456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.
    Loaiza VM; Halse SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1455-1472. PubMed ID: 30070565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Searching for serial refreshing in working memory: Using response times to track the content of the focus of attention over time.
    Vergauwe E; Hardman KO; Rouder JN; Roemer E; McAllaster S; Cowan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1818-1824. PubMed ID: 27068541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Time-Course of the Last-Presented Benefit in Working Memory: Shifts in the Content of the Focus of Attention.
    Valentini B; Uittenhove K; Vergauwe E
    J Cogn; 2021; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 35083411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing different instructed-refreshing schedules: evidence for cumulative, forward-order refreshing of verbal lists?
    Vergauwe E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):102-114. PubMed ID: 29683486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional flexibility and prioritization improves long-term memory.
    Sandry J; Zuppichini MD; Ricker TJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103104. PubMed ID: 32622150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of attention to maintain information in working memory: A developmental investigation of spontaneous refreshing in school-aged children.
    Vergauwe E; Besch V; Latrèche C; Langerock N
    Dev Sci; 2021 Sep; 24(5):e13104. PubMed ID: 33570806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Not all order memory is equal: Test demands reveal dissociations in memory for sequence information.
    Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 27656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does working memory get better with longer time?
    Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1754-1774. PubMed ID: 36326652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can children prioritize more valuable information in working memory? An exploration into the effects of motivation and memory load.
    Atkinson AL; Waterman AH; Allen RJ
    Dev Psychol; 2019 May; 55(5):967-980. PubMed ID: 30816725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are latent working memory items retrieved from long-term memory?
    Mao Chao C; Xu C; Loaiza V; Rose NS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Dec; ():17470218231217723. PubMed ID: 37981748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primacy and recency effects as indices of the focus of attention.
    Morrison AB; Conway AR; Chein JM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():6. PubMed ID: 24478672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of memory load on processing diminishes rapidly during retention in a complex span paradigm.
    Joseph TN; Morey CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1400-1419. PubMed ID: 34570544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for proactive interference in the focus of attention of working memory.
    Carroll LM; Jalbert A; Penney AM; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Tehan G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 20873917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.