These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024330)

  • 1. Neuropsychology of Human Body Parts: Exploring Categorical Boundaries of Tactile Perception Using Somatosensory Mismatch Responses.
    Shen G; Smyk NJ; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1858-1869. PubMed ID: 30024330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using somatosensory mismatch responses as a window into somatotopic processing of tactile stimulation.
    Shen G; Smyk NJ; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13030. PubMed ID: 29139557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Body representation in infants: Categorical boundaries of body parts as assessed by somatosensory mismatch negativity.
    Shen G; Meltzoff AN; Weiss SM; Marshall PJ
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 44():100795. PubMed ID: 32716850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The somatosensory mismatch negativity as a window into body representations in infancy.
    Shen G; Weiss SM; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():144-150. PubMed ID: 30385369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Categorical perception of tactile distance.
    Knight Fle C; Longo MR; Bremner AJ
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 24561189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmenting the body into parts: evidence from biases in tactile perception.
    de Vignemont F; Majid A; Jola C; Haggard P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):500-12. PubMed ID: 18609376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Part-based representations of the body in early childhood: evidence from perceived distortions of tactile space across limb boundaries.
    Le Cornu Knight F; Cowie D; Bremner AJ
    Dev Sci; 2017 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 27321051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body representations as indexed by oscillatory EEG activities in the context of tactile novelty processing.
    Shen G; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107144. PubMed ID: 31319120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical dystonia: Normal auditory mismatch negativity and abnormal somatosensory mismatch negativity.
    Chen JC; Macerollo A; Sadnicka A; Lu MK; Tsai CH; Korlipara P; Bhatia K; Rothwell JC; Edwards MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 129(9):1947-1954. PubMed ID: 30015084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the language we use to segment the body, shape the way we perceive it? A study of tactile perceptual distortions.
    Knight FLC; Bremner AJ; Cowie D
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104127. PubMed ID: 31891831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Visual Attentional Load on the Tactile Sensory Memory Indexed by Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.
    He X; Zhang J; Zhang Z; Go R; Wu J; Li C; Gan K; Chen D
    Front Neuroinform; 2020; 14():575078. PubMed ID: 33324187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interaction between felt touch and tactile consequences of observed actions: an action-based somatosensory congruency paradigm.
    Deschrijver E; Wiersema JR; Brass M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1162-72. PubMed ID: 26152577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting differences with magnetoencephalography of somatosensory processing after tactile and electrical stimuli.
    Hautasaari P; Kujala UM; Tarkka IM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Jan; 311():331-337. PubMed ID: 30218670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regularity of approaching visual stimuli influences spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 28271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial specificity of tactile enhancement during reaching.
    Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2424-2434. PubMed ID: 28741099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological responses to digit stimulation in a tactile oddball paradigm.
    Horger MN; Campbell K; Marshall PJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jul; ():112391. PubMed ID: 38964544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.
    Calzolari E; Azañón E; Danvers M; Vallar G; Longo MR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(17):4555-4560. PubMed ID: 28396426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual stimuli approaching toward the body influence temporal expectations about subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():95-101. PubMed ID: 28389236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expansion of Perceptual Body Maps Near - But Not Across - The Wrist.
    Longo MR
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():111. PubMed ID: 28326030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.