BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024505)

  • 1. Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients' postoperative continence recovery and erectile function: A pooled analysis based on available literatures.
    Wang X; Wu Y; Guo J; Chen H; Weng X; Liu X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11297. PubMed ID: 30024505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncological safety of intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy compared with conventional process: a pooled review and meta-regression analysis based on available studies.
    Wang X; Wu Y; Guo J; Chen H; Weng X; Liu X
    BMC Urol; 2019 May; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31133039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.
    Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Seitz M; Becker AJ; Buchner A; Trittschler S; Stief CG
    World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 24752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Zheng T; Zhang X; Ma X; Li HZ; Gao JP; Cai W; Dong J; Chen GF; Wang BJ; Shi TP; Song EL; Chen WH; Huang QB
    Asian J Androl; 2013 Jul; 15(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 23708458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
    Potdevin L; Ercolani M; Jeong J; Kim IY
    J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19694530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dorsal vein complex preserving technique for intrafascial nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Hoshi A; Usui Y; Shimizu Y; Tomonaga T; Kawakami M; Nakajima N; Hanai K; Nomoto T; Terachi T
    Int J Urol; 2013 May; 20(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 23039276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of transperitoneal robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: single centre's experience.
    Ihsan-Tasci A; Simsek A; Dogukan-Torer MB; Sokmen D; Sahin S; Bitkin A; Tugcu V
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Mar; 39(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 24856651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
    Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Nguyen LN; Head L; Witiuk K; Punjani N; Mallick R; Cnossen S; Fergusson DA; Cagiannos I; Lavallée LT; Morash C; Breau RH
    J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):760-769. PubMed ID: 28286069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
    Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
    BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.
    Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
    Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic versus open bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy after TUR-P for incidental prostate cancer: surgical outcomes and effect on postoperative urinary continence and sexual potency.
    Springer C; Inferrera A; Pini G; Mohammed N; Fornara P; Greco F
    World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1505-10. PubMed ID: 23400788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Lee YS; Shin TY
    Urol J; 2020 Jul; 18(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 32715457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified completely intrafascial radical cysprostatectomy for bladder cancer: a single-center, blinded, controlled study.
    Wang X; Guo J; Wang L; Wang M; Weng X; Chen H; Liu X
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):887. PubMed ID: 34340675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.
    Shin TY; Lee YS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17595. PubMed ID: 33077779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
    Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.