207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024542)
1. A preliminary study: The sequential use of the risk malignancy index and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Qiu L; Yang F; Luo H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11536. PubMed ID: 30024542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: sequential use of the risk of malignancy index and HistoScanning, a novel computer-aided diagnostic tool.
Vaes E; Manchanda R; Autier P; Nir R; Nir D; Bleiberg H; Robert A; Menon U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 39(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21695741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application values of four risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses].
Lou HY; Meng H; Zhu QL; Zhang Q; Jiang YX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.
Wang R; Yang Z
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 36929789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the risk of malignancy index scoring systems (1-4) used in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Ozbay PO; Ekinci T; Caltekin MD; Yilmaz HT; Temur M; Yilmaz O; Uysal S; Demirel E; Kelekci S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):345-9. PubMed ID: 25640377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive Value of Malignancy Risk Indices for Ovarian Masses in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.
Ertas S; Vural F; Vural F; Tufekci EC; Ertas AC; Kose G; Aka N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):2177-83. PubMed ID: 27221915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in women with adnexal masses in Wales.
Abdulrahman GO; McKnight L; Lutchman Singh K
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 53(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 25286794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
