113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30024991)
1. Influence of Rigid Bar and Nonrigid Double Crown Attachments on Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study with Differential Bone Quality.
Kimura T; Yang TC; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):764-769. PubMed ID: 30024991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 2: Palateless Dentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Tomita A; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):357-364. PubMed ID: 29534124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):815-821. PubMed ID: 28708913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1308–1314. PubMed ID: 28938033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 2. Palateless Overdentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 29340347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Reinforcement on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study Under Various Implant Configurations.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e162-e167. PubMed ID: 27861659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 5- to 8-year retrospective study comparing the clinical results of implant-supported telescopic crown versus bar overdentures in patients with edentulous maxillae.
Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1322-30. PubMed ID: 24066324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Inclined Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. An In Vitro Study of Loading and Dislodging Strains.
Elhelbawy NG; ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Mahrous A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):982-988. PubMed ID: 36170313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Palatal Coverage and Implant Distribution on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Mizuno Y; Fujinami Y; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):e136-42. PubMed ID: 27632280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Different Bar Designs on Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 30695085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of bone loss on peri-implant bending strain under overdentures.
Pham NQ; Gonda T; Takahashi T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):900–906. PubMed ID: 30934034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of low-profile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study).
Ameen NM; El-Khodary NM; Abdel-Hamid AM; Fahmy AE
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):982. PubMed ID: 38066586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Palatal Coverage and Implant Distribution on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Tomita A; Mizuno Y; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e43-8. PubMed ID: 27183081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Implant Distribution and Palatal Coverage on the Strain of Splinted Implant and Overdenture in Maxillary Implant Overdentures.
Nishimura Y; Takahashi T; Gonda T; Ikebe K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 33909717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
