186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30025166)
1. Contribution to the Development of Guidelines in the Analysis of Biological Evidence in Sexual Assault Investigations.
Ferreira-Silva B; Porto MJ; Magalhães T; Cainé L
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):534-538. PubMed ID: 30025166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New oral cut-off time limits in NSW.
Nittis M; Franco M; Cochrane C
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():92-97. PubMed ID: 27697690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of spermatozoa detection using the genital swab versus bedside smear slide technique in sexual assault patients.
Sathirareuangchai S; Phobtrakul R; Phetsangharn L; Srisopa K; Petchpunya S
J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Oct; 35():69-72. PubMed ID: 26344463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence Collection and Analysis for Touch Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Groping and Sexual Assault Cases.
Valentine JL; Presler-Jur P; Mills H; Miles S
J Forensic Nurs; 2021 Apr-Jun 01; 17(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 33843809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical forensic sample collection techniques following consensual intercourse in volunteers - cervical canal brush compared to conventional swabs.
Joki-Erkkilä M; Tuomisto S; Seppänen M; Huhtala H; Ahola A; Rainio J; Karhunen PJ
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Oct; 27():50-4. PubMed ID: 25287800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical note: Comparison of forensic swabs for intravaginal sampling.
Egger S; Vöhringer C; Währer J; Schulz I
Sci Justice; 2022 Jul; 62(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 35931447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
Liu JY
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The optimal timing of forensic evidence collection following paediatric sexual assault.
Wood GJ; Smith JAS; Gall JA
J Forensic Leg Med; 2023 Apr; 95():102499. PubMed ID: 36889049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A foldable cardboard box for drying and storage of by cotton swab collected biological samples].
Hochmeister M; Rudin O; Meier R; Peccioli M; Borer U; Eisenberg A; Nagy R; Dirnhofer R
Arch Kriminol; 1997; 200(3-4):113-20. PubMed ID: 9446522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
