111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30028243)
1. How Much Stereoscopic Effect Does Laparoscopy Need? Controlled, Prospective Randomized Trial on Surgical Task Efficiency in Standardized Phantom Tasks.
Kunert W; Auer T; Storz P; Braun M; Kirschniak A; Falch C
Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):515-524. PubMed ID: 30028243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer.
Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Training Performance of Laparoscopic Surgery in Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays.
Lin CJ; Cheng CF; Chen HJ; Wu KY
Surg Innov; 2017 Apr; 24(2):162-170. PubMed ID: 28190372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model.
Schoenthaler M; Schnell D; Wilhelm K; Schlager D; Adams F; Hein S; Wetterauer U; Miernik A
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26242728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.
Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
van der Schatte Olivier RH; Van't Hullenaar CD; Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18855053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.
Storz P; Buess GF; Kunert W; Kirschniak A
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1454-60. PubMed ID: 22179446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of stereoscopic visualization on surgical skill acquisition in novices.
Mistry M; Roach VA; Wilson TD
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 24016365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating a Solely Mechanical Articulating Laparoscopic Device: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.
Criss CN; Jarboe MD; Claflin J; Matusko N; Rooney DM
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Apr; 29(4):542-550. PubMed ID: 30785844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.
Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency.
Tung KD; Shorti RM; Downey EC; Bloswick DS; Merryweather AS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2500-5. PubMed ID: 25537377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope.
van Bergen P; Kunert W; Buess GF
Surg Endosc; 2000 Jan; 14(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 10653241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of guided instrument insertion during laparoscopy: a randomized study with novices in an optical box trainer.
Kunert W; Land C; Braun M; Reichold J; Kirschniak A; Falch C
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):787-795. PubMed ID: 31114950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1241-1253. PubMed ID: 28986719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
