These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30028846)

  • 41. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Identity priming consistently affects perceptual fluency but only affects metamemory when primes are obvious.
    Susser JA; Jin A; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 26371493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs).
    Susser JA; Mulligan NW; Besken M
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):1000-11. PubMed ID: 23661189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Zander T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Separation of encoding fluency and item difficulty effects on judgements of learning.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):2060-72. PubMed ID: 23574510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Do delayed judgements of learning reduce metamemory illusions? A meta-analysis.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B; Albuquerque PB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 28856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.
    Senkova O; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):955-967. PubMed ID: 33398785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Another look at the contribution of motoric fluency to metacognitive monitoring.
    Dollois MA; Poore-Buchhaupt CJ; Fiacconi CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Dec; 76(4):251-269. PubMed ID: 35482620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): an analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Guttentag R
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11352205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Effect of Font Size on Children's Memory and Metamemory.
    Halamish V; Nachman H; Katzir T
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1577. PubMed ID: 30210405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do Judgments of Learning Impair Recall When Uninformative Cues Are Salient?
    Double KS
    J Intell; 2023 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 37888435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. People hold mood-congruent beliefs about memory but do not use these beliefs when monitoring their learning.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK; Goodrich M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(4):499-519. PubMed ID: 34694826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Metacogn Learn; 2022; 17(2):589-625. PubMed ID: 35505852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.